search for: nbd11

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nbd11".

Did you mean: nbd1
2012 Feb 20
1
BTRFS misdetects NBD (Network Block Devices) as SSD
Hello, I have noticed I have the following in my dmesg: [319769.043163] nbd: registered device at major 43 [319769.104176] nbd11: unknown partition table [319769.130273] device fsid c2598ff2-1e3e-4edf-ab19-1f7ab41b0160 devid 1 transid 125743 /dev/nbd11 [319769.130522] btrfs: force lzo compression [319769.130528] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [319802.926547] Btrfs detected SSD devices, enabling SSD mode The /dev/nbd11...
2012 Nov 08
1
OpenStack+libvirt+lxc: lxcContainerGetSubtree:1199 : Failed to read /proc/mounts
...ed 0 0 /dev/nbd13 /home/stack/nova_state/instances/instance-00000073/rootfs ext3 rw,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 /dev/nbd12 /home/stack/nova_state/instances/instance-00000075/rootfs ext3 rw,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 /dev/nbd11 /home/stack/nova_state/instances/instance-00000076/rootfs ext3 rw,relatime,errors=continue,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 /dev/nbd10 /home/stack/nova_state/instances/instance-00000077/rootfs ext3 rw,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 -- Qiu Yu -------------- next part --...
2014 Jun 13
2
Re: libguestfs supermin error
...---- 1 0 0 7, 7 Jan 1 00:00 loop7 drwxr-xr-x 2 0 0 60 Jan 1 00:00 mapper crw------- 1 0 0 1, 1 Jan 1 00:00 mem brw------- 1 0 0 43, 0 Jan 1 00:00 nbd0 brw------- 1 0 0 43, 1 Jan 1 00:00 nbd1 brw------- 1 0 0 43, 10 Jan 1 00:00 nbd10 brw------- 1 0 0 43, 11 Jan 1 00:00 nbd11 brw------- 1 0 0 43, 12 Jan 1 00:00 nbd12 brw------- 1 0 0 43, 13 Jan 1 00:00 nbd13 brw------- 1 0 0 43, 14 Jan 1 00:00 nbd14 brw------- 1 0 0 43, 15 Jan 1 00:00 nbd15 brw------- 1 0 0 43, 2 Jan 1 00:00 nbd2 brw------- 1 0 0 43, 3 Jan 1 00:00 nbd3 brw------- 1 0 0 43, 4 Jan...
2014 Jun 12
2
Re: libguestfs supermin error
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 05:08:37PM +0530, abhishek jain wrote: > Hi Rich > > I have all the virtio modules available in the kernel but I'm getting the > same result . It doesn't appear to be using any kernel modules. I would have expected to see output such as this: supermin: internal insmod virtio.ko It seems as if you might not be setting SUPERMIN_MODULES; or maybe you