Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nbd11".
Did you mean:
nbd1
2012 Feb 20
1
BTRFS misdetects NBD (Network Block Devices) as SSD
Hello,
I have noticed I have the following in my dmesg:
[319769.043163] nbd: registered device at major 43
[319769.104176] nbd11: unknown partition table
[319769.130273] device fsid c2598ff2-1e3e-4edf-ab19-1f7ab41b0160 devid 1 transid 125743 /dev/nbd11
[319769.130522] btrfs: force lzo compression
[319769.130528] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
[319802.926547] Btrfs detected SSD devices, enabling SSD mode
The /dev/nbd11...
2012 Nov 08
1
OpenStack+libvirt+lxc: lxcContainerGetSubtree:1199 : Failed to read /proc/mounts
...ed 0 0
/dev/nbd13 /home/stack/nova_state/instances/instance-00000073/rootfs ext3
rw,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/nbd12 /home/stack/nova_state/instances/instance-00000075/rootfs ext3
rw,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/nbd11 /home/stack/nova_state/instances/instance-00000076/rootfs ext3
rw,relatime,errors=continue,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/nbd10 /home/stack/nova_state/instances/instance-00000077/rootfs ext3
rw,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
--
Qiu Yu
-------------- next part --...
2014 Jun 13
2
Re: libguestfs supermin error
...---- 1 0 0 7, 7 Jan 1 00:00 loop7
drwxr-xr-x 2 0 0 60 Jan 1 00:00 mapper
crw------- 1 0 0 1, 1 Jan 1 00:00 mem
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 0 Jan 1 00:00 nbd0
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 1 Jan 1 00:00 nbd1
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 10 Jan 1 00:00 nbd10
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 11 Jan 1 00:00 nbd11
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 12 Jan 1 00:00 nbd12
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 13 Jan 1 00:00 nbd13
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 14 Jan 1 00:00 nbd14
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 15 Jan 1 00:00 nbd15
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 2 Jan 1 00:00 nbd2
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 3 Jan 1 00:00 nbd3
brw------- 1 0 0 43, 4 Jan...
2014 Jun 12
2
Re: libguestfs supermin error
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 05:08:37PM +0530, abhishek jain wrote:
> Hi Rich
>
> I have all the virtio modules available in the kernel but I'm getting the
> same result .
It doesn't appear to be using any kernel modules. I would have
expected to see output such as this:
supermin: internal insmod virtio.ko
It seems as if you might not be setting SUPERMIN_MODULES; or maybe you