Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "nbb".
Did you mean:
nb
2008 Mar 22
2
[LLVMdev] Say hi to VMKit: JVM/LLVM, CLI/LLVM
Hello, Edwin
> Probably there are more 64-bit issues to solve. Unfortunately I don't
> have time to look into this deeper now.
At least these "4" looks pretty suspicious:
- (void *)gcset((gc **)((unsigned int)this + nbb + 4 - sizeof(void
*)),
+ (void *)gcset((gc **)((size_t)this + nbb + 4 - sizeof(void *)),
(Object*)m);
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov.
Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
2008 Mar 22
0
[LLVMdev] Say hi to VMKit: JVM/LLVM, CLI/LLVM
Nicolas Geoffray wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've just checked in a JVM and a CLI for LLVM (called JnJVM and N3).
> Both are placed in the vmkit svn directory.
> You can find the source code here:
>
Very nice!
> svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/vmkit/trunk vmkit
>
> Its licensed under the U of I Open Source License, so now that's in svn,
> you can
2008 Mar 25
0
[LLVMdev] Say hi to VMKit: JVM/LLVM, CLI/LLVM
...t; Hello, Edwin
>
Hi Anton,
>> Probably there are more 64-bit issues to solve. Unfortunately I don't
>> have time to look into this deeper now.
>>
> At least these "4" looks pretty suspicious:
>
> - (void *)gcset((gc **)((unsigned int)this + nbb + 4 - sizeof(void
> *)),
> + (void *)gcset((gc **)((size_t)this + nbb + 4 - sizeof(void *)),
> (Object*)m);
>
Good point.
I think it would be best to review the code Class by Class to locate
64-bit problems.
Having unit-tests for this code would...
2008 Mar 21
8
[LLVMdev] Say hi to VMKit: JVM/LLVM, CLI/LLVM
Hi everyone,
I've just checked in a JVM and a CLI for LLVM (called JnJVM and N3).
Both are placed in the vmkit svn directory.
You can find the source code here:
svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/vmkit/trunk vmkit
Its licensed under the U of I Open Source License, so now that's in svn,
you can change whatever you want, as long as HelloWorld.java and
HelloWorld.cs work ;-)
I
2013 Sep 30
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: llvm-shlib-test (Was: [llvm] r191029 - llvm-c: Make LLVMGetFirstTarget a proper prototype)
Attached is what I got thus far.
What I'm struggling with is proper integration in build system. What
is in there is just wild guesses from my side, both on autoconf and
cmake variants. It would be great if someone with proper knowledge of
the buildsystems could have a look. Also I'm not sure how to properly
handle compilation on msvc - clearly "-std=c11 -Wstrict-prototypes" is
2003 Nov 23
1
options(width= ) in rw1081
Hola!
I just downloaded and installed the factory-fresh
rw1081. Windows XP.
In my Rprofile file in the \etc subdirectory I put
(among others)
options(continue=" ")
options(width=65)
options(scipen=5)
options(show.signif.stars=FALSE)
R is honoring all of this on startup, exept
the width=65 option, which does'nt have any effect. I tried
other values for width also (70, 90) ,
2012 Sep 26
0
[LLVMdev] Error while loading profile information
...&MBB) {
//double execcnt=1;
int blckno=0;
blckno=MBB.getNumber();
ProfileInfo &PI=getAnalysis<ProfileInfo>();
printf("\n%s:%d",__FILE__,__LINE__);
fflush(stdout);
const BasicBlock *BB=MBB.getBasicBlock();
if(BB!=NULL)
printf("\nBB is not null");
//execcnt=getAnalysis<ProfileInfo>().getExecutionCount(BB);
double execcnt=PI.getExecutionCount(BB);
printf("\nBlock No=%d,ExecCnt=%f",blckno,execcnt);
if(blckno!=-1)
{
oMsProfI[cnt].blockno=blckno;
oMsProfI[cnt].execcnt=execcn...
2009 May 21
1
[PATCH server] Updated look and feel for empty grid views
...^nNhS=^I>U>D(ZLk!5Mm}e5
zbCzB+t~}GyVjHmDQ#oj;5h3<gLtAUEtWrotqT|TPAW5{qC`lp%i4-I%kVr_ARjmk_
z7HDaqoKo8*0?n;kyLj(g)_353S at +i=1Uf~=<8OK!`+L`z93OG87m!+!rivoZ$@2~J
zEMUYEtqocolIUm1j6@|lSw3JRA40l;&$pNkH(9724G9yMa#9DDbwX)<q-!({A$Xin
zc%evyMG1|P?TAoFqy(cNHHt(BGU+ffx^1H*9b?eK63PjS#1Z_0r=NbB{xGhI-%oN4
z8sPo!e?Ra2iT81IGUoW;kY}!3<(X%m;qo`1V|V{H`}^0hb%W6<NtTjj1z8eTvr|=J
z%$!W`BeW;chGCMindZ2BfavWI(joKi7E4_)mj%<%VNwegm8EPfK`3%5NVG$>qbngn
zO1*9!8?EnvC_HH*5p_*d&zVSrUC!9syUoRm7r5W_HuNex)KYPFYm>8Eo4oOf#|XS1
z+c-v}30H64;JIfm^UQP4a`oCxZtb72cd$>0QzE)WMw)l%<eDr`P%Ow2g;F;#vL...
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...lt;^}jn;vu
z%GS$z{IDK9LQCXRWbmf75aAtaoS36}GI6hD(6Z&!hT at N<<EPP0G};w*e617zxt>ZS
z at 0AUOe3cCmIG!djqoMc{>G+uq#eb2GpVd(O$#nc|!Qhqk8T`^_u)RS&e@;UbzDiS=
z+fe+ebo at NoZM(0Xw)3@$&7c;WFItBt%qjeF7M?<l^Pya?;TL#`PdkaTTE(VOi!DTq
z;k%@1KcYD=%S*jT*7JN>gH^F+*a%>+5f;YJs-?LRAFbn%nbbaFFX at QaY`hAu`e5Dc
zYq;B|$c<4PJ)>K5#ByN7=h#dUpJPIHp%tD&@@$B8w`>v7!_GAKDzUB=@kJU(zwuVJ
zvYl0}#*xO6M$L9X4asqd<~T%2z0Ap=a}Cist44BcLT6RUE=hJIH-psny1LL(Ik-%Y
zWS1<HrPxxrDiNL~hvv}+grY35|6rbM&2#o2EVmap=ZXCXiTtM^#23rS`&ewTY~kM(
z(SEwMLMD?YxB_Mb!pM+V0j+JZoC=pyKtv6fiKiCsFP=O+Ks at...
2001 Nov 08
0
[RHSA-2001:106-08] New sendmail packages available which fix a local root exploit
[Fra: bugzilla@redhat.com]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory
Synopsis: New sendmail packages available which fix a local root exploit
Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:106-08
Issue date: 2001-08-28
Updated on: 2001-10-22
Product: Red Hat Linux
Keywords: sendmail