search for: nazare

Hello, I have rails using a MSSQL db. The set up works fine with low volume, but with 2+ requests/second I keep on getting the following error: DBI::DatabaseError: Execute OLE error code:80004005 in Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Cannot create new connection because in manual or distributed transaction mode. HRESULT error code:0x80020009 Exception occurred.: SELECT

On 4 November 2013 08:19, Henrique Santos <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following: > > entry: > result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0 > > landing0: > landingpad > result1 = invoke func1 to defer_block unwind landing1 > > landing1...

Thanks! I will try that and see whether it works. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Henrique Santos < henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > It seems that placing the calls to free at the predecessors of dominance >> frontier is inadequate. It is possible that there are exit blocks that are >> dominated by BB12 (calls to malloc). I guess we can also insert calls to >> free at these...

On 4 November 2013 02:31, Henrique Santos <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > But the incoming value from the landing pad will always be null, won't it? > If so, just iterate through the predecessors and add the terminator as the > incoming value if it's an invoke instruction and add the null value it's > not. > Won...

...re variable length objects allocated through alloca. Otherwise, frame pointer can be omitted as an optimization. If we can ensure that they are deallocated correctly, frame pointers can be omitted even if variable length objects exist. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Henrique Santos < henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > It seems that placing the calls to free at the predecessors of dominance >> frontier is inadequate. It is possible that there are exit blocks that are >> dominated by BB12 (calls to malloc). I guess we can also insert calls to >> free at these...

Hi Henrique, Thanks for the quick reply! On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Henrique Santos < henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > PRE normally uses a latest placement algorithm to do something of the sort. > I don't know about GVN/PRE, but older version of PRE might have it. > Just placing the calls to free at the predecessors (dominated by BB12) of > the dominance frontier of...

====================================================== "Stay positive and happy. Work hard and don't give up hope. Be open to criticism and keep learning. Surround yourself with happy, warm and genuine people." Tena Desae ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release

====================================================== "Stay positive and happy. Work hard and don't give up hope. Be open to criticism and keep learning. Surround yourself with happy, warm and genuine people." Tena Desae ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release

...try coming up with another solution instead. You might consider using -mergereturn. H. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Bin Tzeng <bintzeng at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Henrique, > Thanks for the quick reply! > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Henrique Santos < > henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > >> PRE normally uses a latest placement algorithm to do something of the >> sort. >> I don't know about GVN/PRE, but older version of PRE might have it. >> Just placing the calls to free at the predecessors (dominated by BB12) of >&...

On 9 November 2013 15:03, Henrique Santos <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com>wrote: > It seems like a difficult thing to do since we would have to keep metadata > intact across transformations, which, AFAIK, is not done. > mem2reg, for example, doesn't even propagate debug metadata to phi nodes, > and I'm not really sure if it'...

Hello, I use rsync in the company to make a backup every 4 hours. but I would like to do in a way like this, that the rsync make a backup of the changed files until one month long. EX:- file.bak.001 file.bak.002 ..... This file will be to get always, and so i can get the all files untill an one month old version of the file. Is it possible? Regardes Dipl.-Ing. Nazar Hassan

...located through alloca. Otherwise, frame > pointer can be omitted as an optimization. If we can ensure that they are > deallocated correctly, frame pointers can be omitted even if variable > length objects exist. > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Henrique Santos < > henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > >> It seems that placing the calls to free at the predecessors of dominance >>> frontier is inadequate. It is possible that there are exit blocks that are >>> dominated by BB12 (calls to malloc). I guess we can also insert calls to >&gt...

...mayThrow(), changing their calls to invokes, and freeing the memory before resuming the unwinding. -Hal ----- Original Message ----- > > > Thanks! I will try that and see whether it works. > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Henrique Santos < > henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com > wrote: > > > > > > > It seems that placing the calls to free at the predecessors of > dominance frontier is inadequate. It is possible that there are exit > blocks that are dominated by BB12 (calls to malloc). I guess we can > also insert...

...would make much difference. The "defer block", however, is the target of multiple invokes. I hope this makes sense. : ) H. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com > wrote: > On 4 November 2013 02:31, Henrique Santos > <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > > But the incoming value from the landing pad will always be null, won't > it? > > If so, just iterate through the predecessors and add the terminator as > the > > incoming value if it's an invoke instruction and add the null value it...

If you're talking about the IR, then I don't think so. It seems like perfectly valid. H. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com > wrote: > On 4 November 2013 08:19, Henrique Santos > <henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, what I had in mind was actually something like the following: > > > > entry: > > result0 = invoke func0 to defer_block unwind landing0 > > > > landing0: > > landingpad > > result1 = invoke func1 to defer_...

I created a sample application. Added devise in it, it works fine. Then added cancan gem into it. Created an ability class. define some permissions. Then added line load_and_authorize_resource to the Application Controller, after that when i go to the page http://0.0.0.0:3000/users/sign_in it gave the following error, NameError in Devise/sessionsController#new uninitialized constant Session

...vectorizer and provided a few patches in that thread. It might help for implementing, testing or reasoning about what you're proposing. H On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 9 November 2013 15:03, Henrique Santos < > henrique.nazare.santos at gmail.com> wrote: > >> It seems like a difficult thing to do since we would have to keep >> metadata intact across transformations, which, AFAIK, is not done. >> mem2reg, for example, doesn't even propagate debug metadata to phi nodes, >> and I'm not...

====================================================== "Problems are not the problem; coping is the problem." Virginia Satir ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.5 release series. Changes since 4.5.8: -------------------- o Michael Adam <obnox at

====================================================== "Problems are not the problem; coping is the problem." Virginia Satir ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.5 release series. Changes since 4.5.8: -------------------- o Michael Adam <obnox at

Dears, I am writing a code in Fortran using OpenMP directives. When compiling the code in gfortran 4.4 does not occur any problem. When compiling the code in gfortran 4.6, an error message appears. In other compilers the error does not occur. A small example. ## Code in Fortran        subroutine hello()        implicit none        integer :: nthreads, tid        integer ::