Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "native_functions".
Did you mean:
native_function
2008 Sep 08
0
[LLVMdev] OCaml bindings to LLVM
On 2008-09-05, at 23:26, Jon Harrop wrote:
> I'm having another play with LLVM using the OCaml bindings for a
> forthcoming
> OCaml Journal article and I have a couple of remarks:
>
> Firstly, I noticed that the execute engine is very slow, taking
> milliseconds to call a JIT compiled function. Is this an inherent
> overhead or am I calling it incorrectly or is this
2008 Sep 06
4
[LLVMdev] OCaml bindings to LLVM
I'm having another play with LLVM using the OCaml bindings for a forthcoming
OCaml Journal article and I have a couple of remarks:
Firstly, I noticed that the execute engine is very slow, taking milliseconds
to call a JIT compiled function. Is this an inherent overhead or am I calling
it incorrectly or is this something that can be optimized in the OCaml
bindings?
Secondly, I happened to
2007 Nov 14
0
9 commits - libswfdec/swfdec_as_string.c libswfdec/swfdec_color_as.c libswfdec/swfdec_interval.c test/image test/trace
...@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// makeswf -v 7 -r 1 -o native-run-7.swf native-run.as
+
+trace ("Running all native functions to find crashes");
+trace ("Using undefined, movieclip, object and number as this");
+
+// FIXME: List is not complete, check when implemting new native functions
+var native_functions = [
+ [4,0], [4,1], [5,0], [5,1], [11,0], [100,0], [100,1], [100,2], [100,3],
+ [100,5], [101,0], [101,1], [101,10], [101,11], [101,12], [101,2], [101,3],
+ [101,4], [101,5], [101,6], [101,7], [101,8], [103,0], [103,1], [103,10],
+ [103,11], [103,12], [103,128], [103,13], [103,14], [103,15], [1...