search for: natch

...rom there. So, question 2 (and 2a): how could I have installed Rails from the zip file? Was it already installed and I didn''t realize it? Ultimately, I went to RubyForge and downloaded the latest gems for actionmailer, actionpack, actionwebservice, activerecord, activesupport, rails (natch), and rake. Then I used gem to install them all locally. I even downloaded RadRails, since of course the Eclipse update link didn''t work either. So, finally, question 3 (and even 3a and 3b): how much of this grand kludge was actually necessary? How should I plan to handle this sort...

Hello all. Am I going totally nuts here and just want to check (Natch!) something. A normal check_box has two value posssibilities. One for checked and one for unchecked, the value gets submitted with a form. The check_box_tag on the other hand, has a checked_value (Called just ''value'') and for the unchecked value...nothing, zip, nada. This means...

...tching from cookie sessions (the default) to active record sessions. I''ve created the sessions table via the rake task, uncommented the line config.action_controller.session_store = :active_record_store in my environment.rb file, cleared out my browsers cookies, restarted the server (natch), but still the it''s using cookie_store instead of active_record store. Just to be sure, I added puts statements in the initializer block of each separate store''s ruby classes in vendor rails, and only "cookie_store initialized" come out. What am I missing here? I'&...

Hi, I''ve just quietly opened http://www.extranormal.com/ to the public. There''s been some interest regarding this in the IRC channel on previous occasions, so I thought i''d mention it here. It''s a social networking/dating site, built with Rails (natch). Forums, profiles, image galleries, private messages, groups, private groups with forums and galleries, events and probably some other good stuff. Tag-o-riffic throughout and some ajaxy goodness sprinkled here and there. It''s a spin-off of another site that''s doing well,...

It's great to see this fixed. It's too bad that: a) I didn't have the sense of humor in 2004 to propose KnownUnknowns, and even UnknownUnknowns (a boolean, natch); b) you used a different parameter name than SunSSH (which uses IgnoreIfUnknown). It may not be too late to do something about either of those... I think the Oracle folks will have no problem adding IgnoreUnknown as an alias of IgnoreIfUnknown, so (b) is not a problem. And humor or lack thereo...

Hello ! I'm setting up workstations to acces a lan behind a tinc host (server) in parenthesis, their vpn ip address workstations on the internet running tinc 1.2.3.4 (10.0.0.2) -> internet -> tinc host 4.3.2.1 (10.0.0.1) -> lan 192.168.1.0/24 in linux, no problem : root@natch> cat tinc-up #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev $INTERFACE on windows : tinc-up.bat (after configuring the interface with correct default gateway) route add 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 The route addit...

Let''s move this to the Shorewall Development list.... On Tuesday 10 February 2004 03:14 pm, xavier wrote: > here is a patch to allow this : > |ACCEPT<10/sec:20>:debug fw lan:$ntp_servers udp 123 - - - - ntp > > a problem with the patch is that now the logprefix is mandatory. > i''m trying to debug it, but i can''t find the flaw. Also, with

Hello, Usually when i''ve a hole to poke through firewalls, i have many hosts to update : workstation firewall, lan firewall, the other lan firewall, and the server behind the last firewall. all of them are managed with shorewall... Is there a smart way to update them all at once ? What you guys do on your firewalls ? thanks. -- xavier

Hi ! I tried tinc, i'm very happy with it ; however, i have difficulties firewalling on the vpn itself ; here is my situation and what i'm experiencing: hosta ----| vpn server hostb ----| my interface is named vpn1 i can firewall connexions starting from host a and b to the vpn server (on the vpn server) (iptables -A INPUT -i vpn1 bla bla) i can firewall connexions

I think it would be nice to be able to rate limit an action, too.. suppose I have an action named Accept_good_source : ACCEPT - - tcp - 1024:65535 ACCEPT - - udp - 1024:65535 and that i want to use it in an action called AllowCVS, i can''t limit the cvs usage, but only the general use of Accept_good_source... same goes for userset... as each rule will give one iptables command, I