search for: narrowli

Back in 2009 there was some discussion of the practicality of supporting char sizes greater than 8-bit: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-September/thread.html#6349 http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/thread.html#26025 with the consensus seemingly being "quite doable, please get a good patch and submit". However the current code appears (to my

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:25 AM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:54 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> 2017-05-26 17:47 GMT-07:00 Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: >> >>> Changing a header file somewhere and having to

I've committed this diff. Please test and confirm that it works ok. (If not, then I've botched the macro fixes in the previous commit) Thanks, Damien Miller On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Damien Miller wrote: > ok, with the fixes for the seccomp-bpf sandbox that I just committed > the diff reduces to. > > IMO this is scoped narrowly enough to go in. > > -d > > diff

I have a very standard barplot. My labels are too long to be printed horizontally under each bar, so I am using text to put the labels on a 45 degree slant. However, the labels are spaced more narrowly than the bars, so on an 8 vertical bar plot, the end of the eighth label is lined up with the seventh bar. Preferably I don't want to do every text label separately (I'm having this

2017-05-29 9:25 GMT-07:00 Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>: > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:54 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> 2017-05-26 17:47 GMT-07:00 Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: >> >>> Changing a header file somewhere and having to spend 10 minutes waiting

Hello, everybody. A student asked me a howto question I can't answer. We want the length of the drawn axes to fill the full width and height of the plot, like so: | | * | * | * ---|----------------- However, when we use plot with axes=F and then use the axis commands to add the axes, they do not cross over each other. We get | * |

2017-05-26 17:47 GMT-07:00 Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Changing a header file somewhere and having to spend 10 minutes waiting > for a build leads to a lot of wasted developer time. > > The real culprit here is tablegen. Can we split support and ADT into two > - the parts that tablegen depends on and the parts that it doesn't? >

I've run into a rather narrowly scoped problem .. On test77 and test78, mails from Yahoo's webmail are seen, by fetchmail using imaps, to have a 0-length body. When fetching, it claims "0 body octets". Other mail clients (mutt, kmail) can view the messages fine. pop3s retrieval works as well. Every other email I've received so far works fine. It's just those sent by

This question is specifically motivated by the practical constraints of NVVM, but I don't know anywhere better to ask (hopefully, e.g., @jholewinski is still following), and I believe it concerns general LLVM issues: NVIDIA's libNVVM is built on LLVM 3.2. This means its bitcode and LL text parsers are from that generation. It's interface calls for adding modules as either bitcode

Well, apparently, no pure software solution can be patented (hardware can), least that's what I saw on the national news here in the UK 2 weeks ago. Clive --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word

2017-05-31 17:11 GMT-07:00 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> 2017-05-29 9:25 GMT-07:00 Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>: >> >>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:54 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev < >>> llvm-dev

I have a longitudinal data analysis project. There are 10 observations on each of 15 units, and I'm estimating this with randomly varying intercepts along with an AR1 correction for the error terms within units. There is no correlation across units. Blundering around in R for a long time, I found that for linear/gaussian models, I can use either the MASS method glmmPQL (thanks to

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:10 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > Jeff Bush <jeffbush001 at gmail.com> writes: > >> %tx = select %mask, %x, <0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ...> >> %ty = select %mask, %y, <0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ...> >> %sum = fadd %tx, %ty >> %newvalue = select %mask, %sum, %oldvalue >> >> I believe the generated instructions depend on whether

running (4-Stable) Hi, short form question: how does one run XDM under securelevel>0 ? long version: i've searched for an answer on how to run Xfree/Xorg at a securelevel the X server likes access to /dev/io and some other resources but is not granted access after security is switched on. one way of doing it seems to be to start it before setting the securelevel, but then is doesnt

On 03-03-2017 09:54, Petr Cerny wrote: > Damien Miller wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Eduardo Barretto wrote: >> >>> On 13-02-2017 13:23, Eduardo Barretto wrote: >>> > This patch enables specific ioctl calls for ICA crypto card on s390 >>> > platform. Without this patch, users using the IBMCA engine are not >>> able >>> > to

We have embraced Hiera; we use the YAML configuration system currently and on the whole everyone finds it easy to use and intuitive. However, as our manifests have grown more complex, we have a need to "compile" multiple narrowly-focused classes together into different types of high-level roles. For example, we might have a "webmail" class that pulls together classes for

> It's definitely doable, but I'd be worried about the maintenance burden. Yes, that is a problem. We are currently not allowed to reveal our target (which has 16-bit bytes, and registers with non-power-of-two bit widths) fully, and therefore not able to submit it upstream. One idea we have toyed with is to create a simple "dummy" version of our target, just to be able

Hi everyone, Some Intel processors have a newly disclosed vulnerability named Load Value Injection. One pager on Load Value Injection: https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/software-guidance/load-value-injection Deep dive on Load Value Injection: https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/deep-dive-load-value-injection I wrote this compiler pass that can

I'm sure I'm being stupid so flame away... R2.2.1 on Windoze (boohoo) latest updates of packages. I'm exploring a dataset (land) with three variables looking at an narrowly unbalanced two group (GROUP) ANCOVA of a randomised controlled trial analysing endpoint score (SFQ.LOCF.ENDPOINT) entering the baseline score (SFQ.BASELINE) as covariate and the following work fine: > res.same

On May 9, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Jeff Bush <jeffbush001 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:10 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: >> Jeff Bush <jeffbush001 at gmail.com> writes: >> >>> %tx = select %mask, %x, <0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ...> >>> %ty = select %mask, %y, <0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ...> >>> %sum = fadd %tx, %ty >>> %newvalue