search for: nari

Whoops, forgot llvmdev On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > So i started by looking at naryreassociate, whose pass > description/reason listed for doing it is actually describes bug in > reassociate, and discovered that, in fact, reassociate seems broken, > and should be doing the right thing on most of your testcases. > >

Hi All; Based on what I have to use Trixbox or FreePBX? Can someone advise? Regards Bilal

Hi Daniel, I presume you mean, instead of assigning function arguments distinct ranks ( http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Reassociate_8cpp_source.html#l00282), we should group function arguments in favor of existing pairings. You are not suggesting discarding the entire ranking system, right? I'll look into how that works on my benchmarks. AFAIK, we encountered some cases that seem beyond

Hey Fellows: What happened to the Rails wiki? In http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails it appears a very nasty message, saying something about cialis and some other stuff. cialis soft tab <http://genericcialis.ziomek.us/> [url= http://genericcialis.ziomek.us/]cialis soft tab[/url] buy cheap cialis<http://buycialisonline.xhostar.com/buy-cialis-online.html>[url=

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > I presume you mean, instead of assigning function arguments distinct > ranks > > (http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Reassociate_8cpp_source.html#l00282), > we > > should

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I presume you mean, instead of assigning function arguments distinct ranks > (http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Reassociate_8cpp_source.html#l00282), we > should group function arguments in favor of existing pairings. Existing = pairings reassociate already chose before *not* existing

Just a status note - my beta group is upgrading/upgraded to the new Thunderbird 2.0.0 (OS X & Win32 so far, Linux to come) and beating it up against Dovecot 1.0.0 and all is A-OK, nary a problem in sight. Obviously just an initial status report, but good mojo so far for those curious about trying it. -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

The Folding at Home client seems to be a wonderful stressor of the CentOS server systems I've been burning in. I've been running two copies of the client on physical dual-core and single die dual-core machines for a few days now. Nary a whimper from the machines and only a slight elevation in temperature (they're 1RU rackmount systems with aggressive/loud fans). In contrast, I

I am having problems starting linux after a server install. First, let me say my setup is: semprom 1.8 dfi nf4x pci express x16 video card My bootup always freezes after Entering non-interactive startup. /etc/rc3.d/S00microcode_ctl: microcode device /dev/cpu/microcode doesn't exist? Checking for new hardware Starting cpuspeed: Apllying iptables firewall rules: Starting pcmcia: then it

Im getting ready to upgrade our production server from version 1.1.2 to version 2.0.11. Ive read through the upgrade info. Is there any other gotcha's I should be aware of? thanks, ddh -- Dwayne Hottinger Network Administrator Harrisonburg City Public Schools "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein "The hottest places in

I know this has been discussed repeatedly, so might even say beaten to death, but it is a feature which I need to use. I notice Wayne had a patch to do this listed in the list archives, but I don't know what version of rsync he was patching against. What is the general opinion on using this patch for reliable rsync'ing of extremely small volumes of data of high cost, high latency comms

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451 Summary: Slight addition to the "scp" man page Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Other

R-helpers, I am using the package "drc" to fit a 4 parameter logistic model. When I use the predict function to get prediction on a new dataset, I am not getting the requested confidence or prediction intervals. Any idea what is going on? Here is code to reproduce the problem: --- library(drc) # Fit model to existing dataset in package spinach.model <- drm(SLOPE~DOSE, data =

Hi all, Solaris 10 Ruby 1.8.4 Rails 1.0.0 Postgres 8.1 postgres driver 0.7.1 I''m having a problem with getting paginate() to properly pick up an FK constraint properly. I don''t seem to have this issue with ActiveRecord, however. Consider: create table start_dates ( id bigserial, start_date date unique, max_slots int default 40, primary key (id) ); create

{atlas:307 root} tail log.smb [1999/01/28 17:20:55, 3] param/loadparm.c:lp_add_ipc(1478) adding IPC service [1999/01/28 17:20:55, 2] lib/interface.c:interpret_interfaces(213) Added interface ip=205.181.94.124 bcast=205.181.94.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 [1999/01/28 17:20:55, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(219) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 1014 are available. [1999/01/28

<headline>Short question</headline>: Do people have advice on debugging R programs running after CGIwithR inputting of data from forms? Is there a way of setting up fast local versions if your local machine has to be a windoze (2k) machine (R 2.1.0) and your server is a Debian, ssh shell only set up running R 1.8.0? Are there simple guides to ways of not having to invoke R each

...rent corporate psychology is consumed by big conglomerates. What for? _//_ _//__//_ _//_By the way I am 60 and been following Linux/Linus since Kernel 0.99. Some time before RedHat appeared strong on the scene."_//_ _//__//_ _//_Andreas - 10.2018 _/ It might not be a "PROBABLE" scenario...but its is a POSSIBLE one! What would that entail? Just because Red Hat is a strong contributor to the code now....if "Big Daddy" says to pull the plug....who's to refuse them?...they OWN Red Hat now! And this was my concern, at least as its own entity, RHEL had the luxury of w...

Hello, I have recently installed a lustre cluster which is in a test phase now but will potentially be in 24x7 production if its accepted. I would like input from the list on what the recommendations/best practices are for configuration of a lustre cluster startup. Is it advisable to have lustre on the various server pieces (mgs/mdt/oss''s) start automatically? If not why not?

Hi, I am just installing a new test environment, but this is just for preparing the next one, which will be a production server. I am doing a clean Debian Sarge 3.1 install with stable sources. I have to decide if I install Apache 1.x or 2 now. I have read that FastCGI is better supported/developed for Apache 1.x. Is this (still) true? What is easier, more stable, etc? I want to run rails

FYI, We've been using the 2.4.7pre1 release for several days now, with nary a hang problem. We haven't seen the EOF bug at all, which was what we upgraded for. This is with transfers of as much as 50GB to set up an initial mirror. The only thing we did was set timeout=0 -- which I guess is unnecessary. The semantics of this flag are a bit unclear. We thought was 'time since