search for: nanonext

...lization is not intended to be used to produce a reliable hash stands. Use of `identical()` or `serialize()` is simply not designed to ensure the same hashable object (in terms of bytes). This is echoed by Tomas' comment above. But we note that it is 'good enough' in most cases. Fwiw `nanonext::sha256()` and family directly hashes character strings and raw objects, but uses the same approach as `digest::digest()` elsewhere. So if someone comes up with a canonical binary representation of R objects, it will be able to hash it reliably.