search for: namevalu

HI sorry to be a nuisance to all!!! how can i see the code of a particular function? e.g. nnet just as an example

...on2.4/site-packages/xen/xend/XendNode.py", line 635, in instance File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/xen/xend/XendNode.py", line 92, in __init__ File "/usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/xen/xend/osdep.py", line 140, in _solaris_get_cpuinfo (module, cpunum, combo, namevalue) = kstatline.split (":") ValueError: need more than 3 values to unpack [2008-11-22 10:59:00 579] INFO (SrvDaemon:334) Xend Daemon started [2008-11-22 10:59:00 579] INFO (SrvDaemon:338) Xend changeset: Mon Oct 13 22:14:51 2008 -0700 15904:94bd0a643efe. [2008-11-22 10:59:00 579] INFO (SrvD...

...eGen(); Value *r = right->codeGen(); Value *result = new TempValue; // get unique temporary emit(result->str() + " add " + l->str() + ", " r-str()); return result; } Value *assignExpression::codeGen() { Value *rval = rvalue->codeGen(); Value *lval = new NameValue(ident); emit(lval->str() + " = " + rval->str()); // emit (silly) copy instruction return lval; } What I have suggested to my students is to omit the (non-existent) copy instruction and use the "rval" above as a replacement for all future occurrences of "ident...

...an unquoted version of something in my search list, I get an error message but the ls completes successfully. For example: > attach("x.RData") > ls(file:x.RData) Error in try(name) : object 'x.RData' not found [1] "x" which seems to be because ls first does: nameValue <- try(name) which raises the error, and then goes on to do some substitute(deparse(magic)) to get the name and carries on as if I'd done ls("file:x.RData") Documentation says (with my enumeration): The ?name? argument can specify the environment from which object names...

...eGen(); >  Value *result = new TempValue;  // get unique temporary >  emit(result->str() + " add " + l->str() + ", " r-str()); >  return result; > } > > Value *assignExpression::codeGen() { >  Value *rval = rvalue->codeGen(); >  Value *lval = new NameValue(ident); >  emit(lval->str() + " = " + rval->str());    // emit (silly) copy instruction >  return lval; > } > > What I have suggested to my students is to omit the (non-existent) copy instruction > and use the "rval" above as a replacement for all future...

...eGen(); >  Value *result = new TempValue;  // get unique temporary >  emit(result->str() + " add " + l->str() + ", " r-str()); >  return result; > } > > Value *assignExpression::codeGen() { >  Value *rval = rvalue->codeGen(); >  Value *lval = new NameValue(ident); >  emit(lval->str() + " = " + rval->str());    // emit (silly) copy instruction >  return lval; > } > > What I have suggested to my students is to omit the (non-existent) copy instruction > and use the "rval" above as a replacement for all future...

...= new TempValue;  // get unique temporary >>  emit(result->str() + " add " + l->str() + ", " r-str()); >>  return result; >> } >> >> Value *assignExpression::codeGen() { >>  Value *rval = rvalue->codeGen(); >>  Value *lval = new NameValue(ident); >>  emit(lval->str() + " = " + rval->str());    // emit (silly) copy >> instruction >>  return lval; >> } >> >> What I have suggested to my students is to omit the (non-existent) copy >> instruction >> and use the "rval&q...