search for: namesys

...ect automatically on domU instances. --> Steps completed: lvextend -L +10G /dev/vm_guests/lv_guest1_export If I try to resize my partition inside domU (guest1) - with reiserfs I got : ----- WITHOUT REBOOT ------ guest1:~ # resize_reiserfs /dev/xvda3 resize_reiserfs 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com) /dev/xvda3 already is of the needed size. Nothing to be done --- AFTER REBOOT --- guest1:~ # resize_reiserfs /dev/xvda3 resize_reiserfs 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com) resize_reiserfs: On-line resizing finished successfully. Is that possible to make the new space availabl...

Hello, I am trying to run a fixed effects panel regression on data containing 5 columns and 1,494 rows. I read the data in as follows: >drugsXX<-read.csv(file="C:\\Folder\\vX.X\\Drugs\\drugsXX_panel.csv", head=TRUE, sep=",") Verified it read in correctly and had a good data.frame: >dim(drugsXX) [1] 1494 5 >drugs XX produce expected data with correct column

I have met into this problem when I tried to run panel regression by plm. My code: library(plm) indus <- read.csv(file="full.csv",header=TRUE) industry<-as.data.frame(indus) reg<-lm(LnTSO2 ~ LnPGDP + LnPGDP2 + LnSOES + LnCOES + LnLIMD + LnSHOLD + LnPRIV + LnFIEs + LnEXP + LnIMP + LnLEXRE + LnVALTAX + LnIND1 + LnIND2 + LnIND3 + LnIND4 + LnIND5 + LnIND6 + LnIND7 +

Hi, I am starting to do some benchmarks using mongo (www.namesys.com), and I am surprised by the big difference between ext3/2.2.19 and ext3/2.4.14. Sometimes the latter performs 3 or 4 times faster. Someone has similar results or is there something wrong in my test ? Attached is the benchmark. By the way, during the test, I got the message kernel: EXT3-fs...

Hi All. What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem for database systems and would like to know if ReiserFS will be maintained in CentOS/Linux kernel in the future? Best regards, Rafal.

...;aggressive" journaling attitude -- so combined with the lack of various kernel/utility support in JFS for Linux right now, I'm not using it either. I'll admit, ReiserFS doesn't seem to be overly "aggressive" in journal reads. But there is something to be said about the Namesys' "focus" on the all-important "recovery" tools (probably because they don't get updated immediately when structures do). Case in point, I've had people with just "unclean" ReiserFS partitions _toast_ them when running a full fsck. On the other hand, I'...

Hi, I've been running dovecot-0.99.10 for the past several years, with virtually no problems. Lately, I noticed that the filesystem holding my users' imap maildirs was getting close to full. So... last night, I used tar to copy /var/spool/imap to a new drive (9G scsi, reiserfs) that I then mounted under /var/spool/imap (after moving the old dir aside). After the move, what would take

...ing very large files. Hence it would be more telling to compare performance of BtrFS with a file systems that targets similar workloads. Most prominent example is perhaps ReiserFS, especially its 4th version. I know that it is not in the kernel, and that the current situation around Hans Reiser and Namesys might preclude this to happen altogether, but there are still many people that do use it. Including me. Thus my second question is: you plan to benchmark BtrFS against other file systems, namely Reiser4, in future development stages? This would allow people familiar with performance and space effic...

Hi! I was just wondering how Ext3 and Reiserfs compare. When I reinstalled my server (because of a stupid hacker) I took the opportunity to change to ReiserFS. And I have to say it's really much faster than Ext3. I don't have benchmarks, but for example, stuff like "make dep" on the linux kernel is much faster (even though I had enabled write cache when I was using ext3). So

Hello, I''m quite interested in ZFS, like everybody else I suppose, and am about to install FBSD with ZFS. On that note, i have a different first question to start with. I personally am a Linux fanboy, and would love to see/use ZFS on linux. I assume that I can use those ZFS disks later with any os that can work/recognizes ZFS correct? e.g. I can install/setup ZFS in FBSD, and later use

Everyone, We just had a pretty bad crash on one of production boxes and the ext2 filesystem on the data partition of our box had some major filesystem corruption. Needless to say, I am now looking into converting the filesystem to ext3 and I have some questions regarding ext3 and Linux software RAID. I have read that previously there were some issues running ext3 on a software raid device

I believe 30 sec is the default for the checkpoint interval.  Is this adjustable? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Hi All, We are soon to migrate our mail server from one piece of hardware to another and we would like to take this opportunity to optimize things. As a result, we would like to replace "uw-imapd" and "qpopper" with "dovecot". The version we will be installing is 1.1.13-2, as this is what is available through the latest Debian stable backports. We will also be using

Hi all, I recently bought a Intel D2500HN motherboard with Intel GMA 3600 video card. I want to install FreeBSD 9-Release on it via PXE, but after booting the system, it seems that video card driver doesn't work properly. Have a look at this picture: http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/5648/20120714393.jpg I've tried the # vidcontrol 80x25 but unfortunately it doesn't help. Do

Unfortunately it is a bit more complex, and the truth is less complementary to us than what you write. Reiser4's CPU usage has come down a lot, but it still consumes more CPU than V3. It should consume less, and Zam is currently working on making writes more CPU efficient. As soon as I get funding from somewhere and can stop worrying about money, I will do a complete code review, and

Hello, Stephen, It seem that in the presence of several jornalling file systems in the kernel some mechanism is needed for proper sharing of the ->journal_info pointer in the task_struct. One journalled file system can indirectly call another during page fault in copy_from_user, quota file modification, or __alloc_pages()->balance_classzone()->shrink_cache()->vm_writeback()