search for: namespac'ification

Yes, pretty much. There are a few things that will go in the std namespace because its the way it is and a more natural fit. The other two namespaces already in use (cl and DOT) will be placed under the llvm namespace. The goal is to get everything that is currently at top level and put it in llvm. This means that in your programs, you wouldn't use: cl::XYZ anymor...

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Rahul Joshi wrote: > Coming back to the issues that I had integrating LLVM with > MSSP, will the code in include/Support also be put in the > llvm namespace? That will solve many problems and help prevent > others. Absolutely. -Chris > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:13:03 -0600 (CST) > >From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> > >Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM namespac'ification > >To: LLVMd...

Coming back to the issues that I had integrating LLVM with MSSP, will the code in include/Support also be put in the llvm namespace? That will solve many problems and help prevent others. Rahul ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:13:03 -0600 (CST) >From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM namespac'ification >To: LLVMdev List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> &...

This is just a heads up: Reid Spencer is working up a changeset for LLVM which will put all of the LLVM classes into an 'llvm' namespace. This will make it possible to integrate LLVM with other C++ packages that use classes like 'Type' and 'User'. This should cause very little impact on the actual source base, other than the 'namespace llvm' in header files, and a 'using namespace llvm' in the .cpp...