search for: nameresolution

I have installed a new Win 2003 Applicationserver in a Network with Samba 2.2.1a as PDC. Some clients are not able connect to the Server by entering "\\s-003" into Explorer. When i sniff the Network i can see that NetBIOS Name Resolution doesn't work properly. They get as a response to a name querry to the PDC a wrong Ip-Address back!! Does anybody know how this can happen and

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner Sent: Samstag, 21. Oktober 2017 00:41 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] scp setup jailed chroot on Centos7 > Am 20.10.2017 um 15:58 schrieb Adrian Jenzer <a.jenzer at herzogdemeuron.com>: > > Dear all > > I'm looking for instructions on how to setup a

...92.168.100.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'> <dhcp> <range start='192.168.100.128' end='192.168.100.254'/> </dhcp> </ip> </network> I've setup a guest domain that serves as a proxy and several other guests. # My issue Nameresolution for *.private1 works fine on this network. But I'm not able to resolve domains from the outside world like github.com. I understood that libvirt is forwarding dns resolution requests to the hosts nameserver configured in /etc/resolv.conf in case the dnsmasq instance for the virtual network...

...the private namespace. The router masquerades the private IP's. The existing NT domain in B should be also accessible for NT clients in subnet A. For this reason I want samba to act as a local master browser for net A and to exchange browselists with the domain master browser in net B. Netbios nameresolution will be done via WINS. Domain Master Browser, PDC, WINS etc. are running on WinNT4.0 (SP3 or higher). If anyone has already setup Samba (2.0) to be a local master browser (without producing errors in the logfiles of the domain master browser), an example for smb.conf would be nice. Thank You for...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I just set up a Domain with two DCs. I use Debian jessie the debian-pakages. And bind9 also from the debian repositories. After setting up the first DC everything was working fine. The nameresolution of hosts ans SRV-records worked. Then I set up a second DC also everything aut of the debian-box with bind9 as nameserver. The "join" and the replication of the database worked with no errormessage. BUT then I tested the DNS I saw that only the second DC got alle SRV-records: - -------...

...ainer > I would if I could but external offers only FTP and SCP... > > Regards Adrian AFAIK, for scp you need a proper shell. I've done that exactly once (chrooted ssh) and it was such a pain that I vowed to never do it again. The problem is that inside the chroot, you need: - nameresolution - a minimal passwd/shadow/group file (or ldap) - maybe for scp, you can get away with a rather minimal device-tree - but for actual SSH access, I needed a fairly complete device tree inside the chroot (ttys ...). - that was with FreeBSD 10, I never tried it with anything else (due to its h...

I have configured samba as a PDC for our lab. I wish that users can change their password on any windows client machine of this domain. Now the users can logon to the domain on windows client machine, but when they press Ctrl+Alt+Del to change their domain password, the operation failed. Checking samba's log file, I found that 'auth 1 type failed'. I don't know what this meanes.

...nly FTP and SCP... >> >> Regards Adrian > > > AFAIK, for scp you need a proper shell. > > I've done that exactly once (chrooted ssh) and it was such a pain that I > vowed to never do it again. > > The problem is that inside the chroot, you need: > > - nameresolution > - a minimal passwd/shadow/group file (or ldap) > - maybe for scp, you can get away with a rather minimal device-tree - > but for actual SSH access, I needed a fairly complete device tree inside > the chroot (ttys ...). > - that was with FreeBSD 10, I never tried it with anyth...

Hi All, I have a coupla queries about my 2 latest installs of CentOS 4-3. When I first installed and logged in as the initial user, everything went well, and the system was fast. A reboot, and 2nd login gave the same. But, upon connecting to the net, the system hung at sendmail for almost 4mins, and then gave an error at login about not finding the host, and that Gnome may not work

...gt;     <dhcp> >       <range start='192.168.100.128' end='192.168.100.254'/> >     </dhcp> >   </ip> > </network> > > I've setup a guest domain that serves as a proxy and several other guests. > > # My issue > > Nameresolution for *.private1 works fine on this network. But I'm not > able to resolve domains from the outside world like github.com. This behavior is intentional: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/commit/513122ae93 > > I understood that libvirt is forwarding dns resolution requests to t...

...ania wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > I just set up a Domain with two DCs. I use Debian jessie the > debian-pakages. And bind9 also from the debian repositories. > > After setting up the first DC everything was working fine. The > nameresolution of hosts ans SRV-records worked. > > Then I set up a second DC also everything aut of the debian-box with > bind9 as nameserver. > > The "join" and the replication of the database worked with no > errormessage. > > BUT then I tested the DNS I saw that only the seco...

Hi All, Firstly, I know this is a MacOS X issue and not sure if you guys can help, but I'm really hoping you can since I don't appear to be getting any joy elsewhere. Running OSX 10.5.4 and recently (last week) nmbd is hogging the CPU. I know this is a part of the Samba server on OSX, hence the post to this mail-list. When I disconnect from the network, nmbd goes away and doesn't