search for: namer

...g correct recognition of some intrinsics in the their text form. I'm not quite sure what GET_FUNCTION_RECOGNIZER is used for, but if it's used, it's broken… ;-) Here's a small segment: // Function name -> enum value recognizer code. #ifdef GET_FUNCTION_RECOGNIZER StringRef NameR(Name+6, Len-6); // Skip over 'llvm.' switch (Name[5]) { // Dispatch on first letter. default: break; case 'A': … if (NameR.startswith("MDIL.barrier.")) return AMDILIntrinsic::AMDIL_barrier; if (NameR.startswith("MDIL.barrier.global."))...

...ir text form. I'm not quite sure what GET_FUNCTION_RECOGNIZER is used for, but if it's used, it's broken… ;-) >> >> Here's a small segment: >> >> // Function name -> enum value recognizer code. >> #ifdef GET_FUNCTION_RECOGNIZER >> StringRef NameR(Name+6, Len-6); // Skip over 'llvm.' >> switch (Name[5]) { // Dispatch on first letter. >> default: break; >> case 'A': >> … >> if (NameR.startswith("MDIL.barrier.")) return AMDILIntrinsic::AMDIL_barrier; >> if (Name...

...e intrinsics in the their text form. I'm not quite sure what GET_FUNCTION_RECOGNIZER is used for, but if it's used, it's broken… ;-) > > Here's a small segment: > > // Function name -> enum value recognizer code. > #ifdef GET_FUNCTION_RECOGNIZER > StringRef NameR(Name+6, Len-6); // Skip over 'llvm.' > switch (Name[5]) { // Dispatch on first letter. > default: break; > case 'A': > … > if (NameR.startswith("MDIL.barrier.")) return AMDILIntrinsic::AMDIL_barrier; > if (NameR.startswith("MDI...

...ve used the following code to cross-reference the age data across records of the same year but am having trouble getting this work. I am also unsure how to cross-reference this to assign age status to records of the same individual recorded in later years. id<-unique(dat$id) year<-c(1,2,3,8) namer<-cbind(pit,season) namer<-data.frame(namer) for (i in 1:nrow(namer)) { dat$age[dat$id == namer[i,1] & dat$year== namer[i,2]] <- "Adult" } Any help would be gratefully recieved, Thanks -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/conditional-value-assi...

...ECOGNIZER is used for, but if it's > used, it's broken… ;-) > >>> > >>> Here's a small segment: > >>> > >>> // Function name -> enum value recognizer code. > >>> #ifdef GET_FUNCTION_RECOGNIZER > >>> StringRef NameR(Name+6, Len-6); // Skip over 'llvm.' > >>> switch (Name[5]) { // Dispatch on first letter. > >>> default: break; > >>> case 'A': > >>> … > >>> if (NameR.startswith("MDIL.barrier.")) return >...

...ot quite sure what GET_FUNCTION_RECOGNIZER is used for, but if it's used, it's broken… ;-) >>> >>> Here's a small segment: >>> >>> // Function name -> enum value recognizer code. >>> #ifdef GET_FUNCTION_RECOGNIZER >>> StringRef NameR(Name+6, Len-6); // Skip over 'llvm.' >>> switch (Name[5]) { // Dispatch on first letter. >>> default: break; >>> case 'A': >>> … >>> if (NameR.startswith("MDIL.barrier.")) return AMDILIntrinsic::AMDIL_barrier;...

...e a string such as `"list(''=1+"` sets the `ParseStatus` to incomplete parsing error but trying to parse `"list(''=123"` will result in R sending a message to the console (followed but a crash): ``` R[write to console]: Error: attempt to use zero-length variable nameR[write to console]: Fatal error: unable to initialize the JIT*** stack smashing detected ***: <unknown> terminated ``` Is there a reason for the difference in behavior, and is there a workaround ? Thanks, Laurent [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

..."` sets the >> `ParseStatus` to incomplete parsing error but trying to parse >> `"list(''=123"` will result in R sending a message to the console (followed but a crash): >> >> ``` >> R[write to console]: Error: attempt to use zero-length variable nameR[write to console]: Fatal error: unable to initialize the JIT*** stack smashing detected ***: <unknown> terminated >> ``` >> >> Is there a reason for the difference in behavior, and is there a workaround ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Laurent >>...

Full_Name: Roger Bivand Version: 0.99.0 OS: RH Linux 6.1 Submission from: (NULL) (158.37.60.152) I am working on an interface between R and the GRASS geographical information system, written in R, with no dynamically loaded code. I have written full examples, and tested then under R 0.90.1, both by entering example() for each function and R CMD check, both of which worked without problem. Under

...omplete parsing error but trying to parse > >>> `"list(''=123"` will result in R sending a message to the console > (followed but a crash): > >>> > >>> ``` > >>> R[write to console]: Error: attempt to use zero-length variable > nameR[write to console]: Fatal error: unable to initialize the JIT*** stack > smashing detected ***: <unknown> terminated > >>> ``` > >>> > >>> Is there a reason for the difference in behavior, and is there a > workaround ? > >>> > >>&g...

...t;list(''=1+"` sets the > `ParseStatus` to incomplete parsing error but trying to parse > `"list(''=123"` will result in R sending a message to the console (followed but a crash): > > ``` > R[write to console]: Error: attempt to use zero-length variable nameR[write to console]: Fatal error: unable to initialize the JIT*** stack smashing detected ***: <unknown> terminated > ``` > > Is there a reason for the difference in behavior, and is there a workaround ? > > Thanks, > > > Laurent > > [[alternative HTML version de...

...;>> `ParseStatus` to incomplete parsing error but trying to parse >>> `"list(''=123"` will result in R sending a message to the console (followed but a crash): >>> >>> ``` >>> R[write to console]: Error: attempt to use zero-length variable nameR[write to console]: Fatal error: unable to initialize the JIT*** stack smashing detected ***: <unknown> terminated >>> ``` >>> >>> Is there a reason for the difference in behavior, and is there a workaround ? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>&gt...

Hi John, %4 is not returned, because it's a temp register value and not a named variable. But you can implement something like the code below to get this value. (Not the most elegant, but more or less working solution). static std::string getName(Instruction* i) { if(i->getOpcode() == Instruction::Store) { return

...t;> >>> `"list(''=123"` will result in R sending a message to the console >>> (followed but a crash): >>> >>> >>> >>> ``` >>> >>> R[write to console]: Error: attempt to use zero-length variable >>> nameR[write to console]: Fatal error: unable to initialize the JIT*** stack >>> smashing detected ***: <unknown> terminated >>> >>> ``` >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there a reason for the difference in behavior, and is there a >>> workar...

Hi. I found that, in all the LLVM IR I get from the source C file. the unnamed values all created by the "load" instruction. eg: ; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable define i32 @add(i32 %x, i32 %y) #0 { entry: %x.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %y.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %c = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %x, i32* %x.addr, align 4 store i32 %y, i32* %y.addr, align 4 * %0 =

...t trying to parse >> >>> `"list(''=123"` will result in R sending a message to the console >> (followed but a crash): >> >>> >> >>> ``` >> >>> R[write to console]: Error: attempt to use zero-length variable >> nameR[write to console]: Fatal error: unable to initialize the JIT*** stack >> smashing detected ***: <unknown> terminated >> >>> ``` >> >>> >> >>> Is there a reason for the difference in behavior, and is there a >> workaround ? >> >...

...t trying to parse > >>> `"list(''=123"` will result in R sending a message to the > console (followed but a crash): > >>> > >>> ``` > >>> R[write to console]: Error: attempt to use zero-length > variable nameR[write to console]: Fatal error: unable to > initialize the JIT*** stack smashing detected ***: <unknown> > terminated > >>> ``` > >>> > >>> Is there a reason for the difference in behavior, and is there > a workaround ? >...

...=123"` will result in R sending a message to the console > >>>> (followed but a crash): > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ``` > >>>>>>> R[write to console]: Error: attempt to use zero-length variable > >>>> nameR[write to console]: Fatal error: unable to initialize the JIT*** > stack > >>>> smashing detected ***: <unknown> terminated > >>>>>>> ``` > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is there a reason for the difference in behavi...

...`"list(''=123"` will result in R sending a message to the >> console (followed but a crash): >> >>> >> >>> ``` >> >>> R[write to console]: Error: attempt to use zero-length >> variable nameR[write to console]: Fatal error: unable to >> initialize the JIT*** stack smashing detected ***: <unknown> >> terminated >> >>> ``` >> >>> >> >>> Is there a reason for the difference in behavior, a...

Hello, I'm new to llvm development and I have a question which I think should be straight forward, but I am having trouble figuring it out. I want to be able to access the return variable name for an instruction. For some instructions I can get this value through the "getName" method. For example, with the instruction: > %arg11 = bitcast i32* %arg1 to i8*, !dbg !42, !id