Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "namedregistergroup".
2004 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] Target.td:Register changes
...uot;has an explicit name" and "does not have an
explicit name" means we need to have duplicate tblgen classes, e.g.
NamedRegister vs Register. I think the reason for making this change
was because we were introducing RegisterGroup and didn't want to have
to introduce NamedRegisterGroup for consistency.
-Chris
--
http://llvm.org/
http://nondot.org/sabre/
2004 Nov 16
2
[LLVMdev] Target.td:Register changes
Hi, looking at the fresh CVS state I see:
class Register<string n> : RegisterBase<n> {
list<RegisterBase> Aliases = [];
}
while previously the Register class did not require any parameters. The change
log is just:
* Target.td: Revamp the Register class, and allow the use of the
RegisterGroup class to specify aliases directly in register
definitions.
and I