search for: named_scopes

Here are my scopes: default_scope :order => ''posted_on DESC'', :conditions => { :status => ''visible'' } named_scope :positive, :conditions => { :rating => ''positive'', :status => ''visible'' } named_scope :neutral, :conditions => { :rating => ''neutral'', :status =>

I recently upgraded to Rails 3, and this error has come up ubiquitously: DEPRECATION WARNING: Base.named_scope has been deprecated, please use Base.scope instead. Any ideas on how to get rid of it? Or should I just wait for something? There''s actually no place in my application where the code "Base.named_scope" exists, so I assume the problem is inherent in gems that

Hi, this is a general design question and I liked to see how other people handle the following situation: Before named_scope I wrote custom finders for my model classes. Something like # order.rb class Order < ActiveRecord::Base class << self def find_all_marked find(:all, :conditions => {:marked => 1}, :order => ''name ASC'') end end end Now

...y/gems/1.9.1/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/named_scope.rb:97:in `call'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/named_scope.rb:97:in `block (2 levels) in named_scope'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/searchlogic-2.3.11/lib/searchlogic/named_scopes/association_conditions.rb:47:in `association_condition_options'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/searchlogic-2.3.11/lib/searchlogic/named_scopes/association_conditions.rb:42:in `create_association_condition'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/searchlogic-2.3.11/lib/searchlogic...

...torial way to set up a many- to-many association. I''m trying to implement a simple search function, so that I can search for a picture with several given tags. Now say I want to search for pics that are tagged with "dog" and "cat". The simplest way to do this is to use named_scopes, for example: [code] class Pic < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :pic_tags has_many :tags, :through => :pic_tags named_scope :dog, options_for_tag(“dog") # options_for_tag(tag) is a method to generate joined table search conditions, not important named_scope :cat, options_for_tag(&...

Hi, Rails 2.3.2 class TestD < ActiveRecord::Base default_scope :limit => 12 named_scope :limit, lambda { |num| { :limit => num} } end ruby script/console >> TestD.all TestD Load (0.7ms) SELECT * FROM "test_ds" LIMIT 12 => [] >> TestD.limit(14) TestD Load (0.3ms) SELECT * FROM "test_ds" LIMIT 12 => [] Any ideas why the default limit

I just entered this ticket. http://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/404-named_scope-bashes-critical-methods It turns out that in an ActiveRecord model like this Model << ActiveRecord::Base named_scope :public private def private_method end public def public_method end end The method public_method will be private because named scope

I have many named_scopes chained together in the normal way. So far so good. However in a couple of cases where: 1. The named scope is actually a correlated subquery and I need to pass additional scope into it sometimes. 2. Where the presence of a named scope in the chain should change the behaviour of a named_scope...

I just opened a Rails ticket on a problem with named_scope in Rails 2.1, and cross-posted a message here which I send to rails-core. I''m still a bit mystified, because I''m having a problem caused by this on RSpec 1.1.4, but not on 1.1.3, and I don''t see a difference in code which would explain it. The basic problem, which I encountered upgrading our rails app to RSpec

I have a model layer containing Movie, Person, Role, and RoleType, making it possible to express facts such as "Clint Easterbunny is director of the movie Gran Milano". The relevant model and associations look like this class Movie < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :roles, :include => :role_type, :dependent => :destroy has_many :participants, :through => :roles, :source

Hi, I''d like to eager load a named_scope like this: User.find(params[:id], :include => [:friends.married]) Any ideas? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To

hi guys, I need a recommendation for searching with regards to timestamp & foreign key attributes. Sounds a bit too much but here''s an example. Suppose we have a "blog" object. It has many attributes such as - title - content - status_id - created_at - updated_at There are also "status" objects which have the following statuses, "new",

Hello there, I have a model that has more then one named_scope. In my action Index of the controller that handle this model I want to do this in a drier way: if params[:ownership] == "mine" @posts = Post.tagged_with(params[:tags], :on => :tags).owner(current_user.id).paginate :all, :page => params[:page], :order => ''created_at DESC'' else

Hi guys, I''m just beginning to use RSpec and I ran into the issue of testing a named_scope. I''m not actually trying to test its behavior, as it''s not my code, but I wanted to test at least that it''s defined. I tried doing this: describe Post, ".most_recent" do it "should be defined" do Post.method_defined?(:most_recent).should be_true

Hey all, Does someone want to look over a super-trivial patch I just submitted? It''s just correcting a typo; someone accidentally spelled "group_by_title" as "gruop_by_title" in the category.rb model in the activerecord tests. I just fixed it in the model, and in the two places it''s referenced in the habtm test. Thanks, Ben -- You received this message

...ry.timesheet_enterable_task_type_project_id_equals(217).entry_type_equals("project") NoMethodError: undefined method `timesheet_enterable_task_type_project_id_equals'' for #<Class: 0x36bd660> from /Users/chino/Documents/git/isf001/vendor/plugins/searchlogic/lib/ searchlogic/named_scopes/conditions.rb:88:in `method_missing'' from /Users/chino/Documents/git/isf001/vendor/plugins/searchlogic/lib/ searchlogic/named_scopes/association_conditions.rb:19:in `method_missing'' from /Users/chino/Documents/git/isf001/vendor/plugins/searchlogic/lib/ searchlogic/named_scopes/a...

class Category has_many :tracks end class Track belongs_to :category, :counter_cache => true named_scope :converted, :conditions => {:converted => true} named_scope :active, :conditions => {:active => true} end I want to make custom counters for scoped associations, e.g: category.converted_tracks_count category.active_tracks_count And when `track` changes its converted,

I am trying to build a shared-appointment system, where users can subscribe to appointments and be updated whenever changes are made to them. I have three objects in this system, appointments, users, and subscribers. Subscribers are a polymorphic object like so: class Subscriber < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user belongs_to :subscribable, :polymorphic => true end The tricky part is

Is it possible to specify that certain tables not be cleared on each example. I''ve inherited a project where a good amount of enumerated data is stored in the database (US States, statuses, about 15-20 tables worth. Over all, it''s a reasonable decision that leads to solid production code (acts_as_enumerated is good). This data is read-only and relatively static; any

Is there a way to DRY this up a bit? named_scope :has_valid_sysoid, lambda{|sysoid| (sysoid.nil?) ? {:conditions => ["nodesysoid IS NOT NULL AND nodelabel LIKE ''%-to-%''"], :include => [:ipinterface, :alarm]} : {:conditions => ["nodesysoid IS NOT NULL AND nodelabel LIKE ''%-to-%'' AND nodesysoid = ? ", sysoid], :include =>