search for: nameclash

Hi! I am trying to match a string in an ERB template but for what ever reason it does not work. <% if has_variable?("apache2_phpmyadmin_url") && apache2_phpmyadmin_url != "" then %> ProxyPass /<%= apache2_phpmyadmin_url %>/ ! <% end %> The conditional works on has_variable? but the != "" is not getting evaluated. When the

Making third-party plugins for Dovecot is really hard and frustrating. Using dovecot 2.2.33.2 and the following sources, the compile errors keep coming. The use of g++ is mandated as the underlying backend this plugin will access only has a C++ interface. == Source 1 /* g++-7 -c a.cpp */ #include <byteswap.h> #include <dovecot/lib.h> #include <dovecot/auth-request.h> #include

...not get passed to files that source the class definition. That is, if class1 features global constant CONSTANT=3, then if class2 sources class1, it will also include the constant. This 1) clutters the namespace when running the code interactively, 2) potentially overwrites the constants in case of nameclash. Some kind of export/nonexport variable syntax, or symbolic import, or namespace would be useful. I know if I converted it to a package I would get at least something like a namespace, but still. I understand that the variable cannot just not be imported, in general, as the functions will generall...

Ok, here's another best practices question - let's say I'm writing a package and I want to use a function name that is already claimed by a function in the base R packages. For the sake of argument, let's pretend this function is for profiling the performance of a function (like Rprof for example), and so an obvious name that comes to mind is profile. This, of course, clashes

...not get passed to files that source the class definition. That is, if class1 features global constant CONSTANT=3, then if class2 sources class1, it will also include the constant. This 1) clutters the namespace when running the code interactively, 2) potentially overwrites the constants in case of nameclash. Some kind of export/nonexport variable syntax, or symbolic import, or namespace would be useful. I know if I converted it to a package I would get at least something like a namespace, but still. > > I understand that the variable cannot just not be imported, in general, as the functions will...

...not get passed to files that source the class definition. That is, if class1 features global constant CONSTANT=3, then if class2 sources class1, it will also include the constant. This 1) clutters the namespace when running the code interactively, 2) potentially overwrites the constants in case of nameclash. Some kind of export/nonexport variable syntax, or symbolic import, or namespace would be useful. I know if I converted it to a package I would get at least something like a namespace, but still. >> >> I understand that the variable cannot just not be imported, in general, as the funct...

...not get passed to files that source the class definition. That is, if class1 features global constant CONSTANT=3, then if class2 sources class1, it will also include the constant. This 1) clutters the namespace when running the code interactively, 2) potentially overwrites the constants in case of nameclash. Some kind of export/nonexport variable syntax, or symbolic import, or namespace would be useful. I know if I converted it to a package I would get at least something like a namespace, but still. >>> >>> I understand that the variable cannot just not be imported, in general, as th...

Folks, A new release candidate for 3.2.0 has just been checked into the xen-unstable tree. It''s available from staging and will be in the main tree when it has passed internal regression tests. Meanwhile, in preparation for 3.1.3, please let me know if there are any further patches from xen-unstable that should be backported into the 3.1 branch. You can pull the xen-3.1-testing.hg