search for: naismith

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "naismith".

Did you mean: adsmith
2000 Apr 02
0
Feature report
...m with all SAMBA version 2.05 to 2.07pre 3 SAMBA is running on DEC UNIX 4.0F For no reason that we can see some users are no longer being allowed to connect to their shares. We see the problem with WIN95, 98 2000 (all plain passwd) Let me explain more clearly If I map netowrk drive //joequimby/naismith my own user and passwd are not recognised (failed to mount) I can logon on read only to my share by using another users id and passwd I can mount writeable their share using their id and passwd So passwd information is apparently being sent correctly. The passwd is random letters and numbers n...
2010 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] Dataflow analysis based optimisations
...oth upvalues and objects. Does LLVM have any mechanism for doing the kind of dataflow analysis required to track object lifetime like this? -- ┌─── dg@cowlark.com ───── http://www.cowlark.com ───── │ │ "Home is where, when you have to go there, they have to take you in." │ --- Cordelia Naismith -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 254 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100828/8bd77191/attachment.sig>
2010 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] Dataflow analysis based optimisations
...LVM have any mechanism for doing the kind of dataflow analysis > required to track object lifetime like this? > > -- > ┌─── dg@cowlark.com ───── http://www.cowlark.com ───── > │ > │ "Home is where, when you have to go there, they have to take you in." > │ --- Cordelia Naismith > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >
2000 Apr 07
0
Password problems with Samba on Alpha system
...via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. dns proxy = no preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes case sensitive = no default case = lower # Added 27/3/00 by JRB oplocks = false sync always = true valid users = naismith, @nais, @glt2, @system revalidate = true log level = 4 #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories writable = yes guest ok = no read only = no browseable = no valid users = naismith, @nais,...
2010 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] Line number information (and other metadata)
On 2 September 2010 19:16, David Given <dg at cowlark.com> wrote: > I really don't want to build from SVN --- developing against a moving > target is never fun, and apart from anything else, it makes it much > harder for anyone else to use my code. Actually, unless you're planning to release your code in less than 2 months, developing in the SVN makes much more sense than
2010 Sep 02
3
[LLVMdev] Line number information (and other metadata)
On 02/09/10 18:28, Jim Grosbach wrote: > On Sep 2, 2010, at 4:05 AM, Renato Golin wrote: [...] >> I suggest you getting the SVN code, since quite a lot has changed >> since last freeze. > > Vigourously seconded. It's very true in general, but with regards to debug information in particular, "quite a lot has changed since 2.7" is an understatement. It's an
2010 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] Dataflow analysis based optimisations
...ons to either a call to malloc or an alloca instruction. I see vague references to an LLVM malloc instruction; did this disappear after 2.6? -- ┌─── dg@cowlark.com ───── http://www.cowlark.com ───── │ │ "Home is where, when you have to go there, they have to take you in." │ --- Cordelia Naismith -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 254 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100828/109e611e/attachment.sig>
2013 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] [ast-dump] Class template partial specializations missing from an implicit class template instantiation?
I was looking at the ClassTemplatePartialSpecializationDecl::getInstantiatedFromMember documentation, in the included example it says: "(..) the instantiation of Outer<float>::Inner<int*> will end up instantiating the partial specialization Outer<float>::Inner<U*> (...)". To understand the concept better, I dumped the AST for the following code: