Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "nailbunni".
Did you mean:
nailbunny
2016 Oct 13
2
Data Stale at random intervals
Here are the results of a restart as well as a stop/start. Seems like it may be the server? I tried to run the nut-server service with gdb, but no luck getting it to work so far. Thanks!
________________________________
From: Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 8:20 PM
To: Daniel Shields
Cc: nut-upsuser at lists. alioth. debian. org
Subject: Re:
2016 Oct 14
0
Data Stale at random intervals
Just an update, these messages are in the syslog when nut is no longer able to communicate with the server:
Oct 14 01:41:59 golgotha upsmon[1300]: Poll UPS [nailbunny at localhost] failed - Data stale
Oct 14 01:42:04 golgotha upsmon[1300]: Poll UPS [nailbunny at localhost] failed - Data stale
Oct 14 01:42:09 golgotha upsmon[1300]: Poll UPS [nailbunny at localhost] failed - Data stale
Oct 14
2016 Oct 15
2
Data Stale at random intervals
Ran with gdb:
gdb /lib/nut/usbhid-ups
run -u nut -a nailbunny -x bus=010 -x vendorid=0764 -x productid=0501 -DDDDD
Same result as when I ran normally. Driver just stops communicating with no errors or messages in the logs. Not sure where to go from here as I'm not seeing anything to follow up on.
________________________________
From: Daniel Shields <grungelizard9 at
2016 Oct 15
2
Data Stale at random intervals
Hi Charles,
Thanks for the tip. I reran the debug again until communication stopped. Backtrace is below. Thanks!
441.204990 upsdrv_updateinfo... (Driver stopped communicating)
Broadcast message from nut at golgotha.tklapp.com (somewhere) (Sat Oct 15 03:36:57
UPS nailbunny at localhost is unavailable
^C
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x00007ffff76ec1c7 in ioctl
2016 Oct 11
2
Data Stale at random intervals
Hello All,
Been at this for a few weeks, so figured I'd reach out. I was previously running Debian Wheezy Nut Version 2.6.4 with no issues for over 6 months on the same hardware. This issue started when I upgraded to Jessie, so just trying to get everything happy again.
System is running "Linux golgotha.tklapp.com 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 (2016-09-03)
2016 Oct 16
0
Data Stale at random intervals
I've been testing with debug further and there's a few extra lines when the nut-server stops communicating as opposed to when it's running.
Backtrace after stale data, UPS nailbunny at localhost is unavailable:
^C
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x00007ffff76ec1c7 in ioctl () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff76ec1c7 in ioctl () from
2016 Oct 15
0
Data Stale at random intervals
On Oct 14, 2016, at 8:53 PM, Daniel Shields <grungelizard9 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ran with gdb:
>
> gdb /lib/nut/usbhid-ups
>
> run -u nut -a nailbunny -x bus=010 -x vendorid=0764 -x productid=0501 -DDDDD
>
> Same result as when I ran normally. Driver just stops communicating with no errors or messages in the logs. Not sure where to go from here as I'm
2016 Oct 25
0
Data Stale at random intervals
Hi Charles,
Tried it with -p but couldn't get it to run, I'll have to dig further into the man pages. I ran without -p though and got an interesting timeout error. Attached is the log. I'll look further into the -p option as well. Tried sending the full zipped log but it was too big. Attaching the part where the error occurred. It seems like it was able to recover a couple
2016 Oct 22
3
Data Stale at random intervals
- Charles
> On Oct 16, 2016, at 3:34 AM, Daniel Shields <grungelizard9 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've been testing with debug further and there's a few extra lines when the nut-server stops communicating as opposed to when it's running.
>
>
> Backtrace after stale data, UPS nailbunny at localhost is unavailable:
>
Sorry to take a while to get back to you
2016 Oct 12
4
Data Stale at random intervals
On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:07 PM, Daniel Shields wrote:
>
> No joy. Reverted.
A wrong number for the udev rules file would prevent the driver from starting at all due to permissions errors. It is possible that 52 and 62 are currently in the acceptable range.
>
> From: Daniel Shields <grungelizard9 at hotmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:19 PM
> To: nut-upsuser