search for: na_na

...NOWN_SORTEDNESS *in *Is_sorted* and 0 in *No_NA *simply means unknown sorted/NA status of the vector, so R will loop over the vector and find the answer. However, what should we return in these functions to indicate whether the vector has been sorted/ contains NA? My initial guess is 0/1 but since *NA_NA *uses 0 as its default value so it will be ambiguous. Are there any macros to define yes/no return values for these functions? I would appreciate any thought here. Best, Jiefei [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...*Is_sorted* and 0 in *No_NA *simply means > unknown sorted/NA status of the vector, so R will loop over the vector and > find the answer. However, what should we return in these functions to > indicate whether the vector has been sorted/ contains NA? My initial guess > is 0/1 but since *NA_NA *uses 0 as its default value so it will be > ambiguous. Are there any macros to define yes/no return values for these > functions? I would appreciate any thought here. > > > > Best, > > Jiefei > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...orted* and 0 in *No_NA > *simply means > unknown sorted/NA status of the vector, so R will loop over the vector and > find the answer. However, what should we return in these functions to > indicate whether the vector has been sorted/ contains NA? My initial guess > is 0/1 but since *NA_NA *uses 0 as its default value so it will be > ambiguous. Are there any macros to define yes/no return values for these > functions? I would appreciate any thought here. > > > > Best, > > Jiefei > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _________________...

...NA >> *simply means >> unknown sorted/NA status of the vector, so R will loop over the vector and >> find the answer. However, what should we return in these functions to >> indicate whether the vector has been sorted/ contains NA? My initial guess >> is 0/1 but since *NA_NA *uses 0 as its default value so it will be >> ambiguous. Are there any macros to define yes/no return values for these >> functions? I would appreciate any thought here. >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Jiefei >> >> [[alternative HTML versi...