Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "n4509".
Did you mean:
4509
2016 Jan 31
2
Adding sanity to the Atomics implementation
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ben via llvm-dev Craig" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 9:41:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Adding sanity to the Atomics implementation
>
>
> I don't have much of substance to add, but I will say that I like the
> proposal (I too prefer Alternative
2016 Jan 28
0
Adding sanity to the Atomics implementation
I don't have much of substance to add, but I will say that I like the
proposal (I too prefer Alternative A). When adding C11 atomic support
for hexagon, I found it surprising that support for the __sync_* was
implemented completely differently than the C11 atomics.
On 1/27/2016 1:55 PM, James Knight via llvm-dev wrote:
> Right now, the atomics implementation in clang is a bit of a