search for: n40l

Hi All, A friend gave me his HP ProLiant N40L and I am wondering if anyone has installed CentOS 6 on it? Raided the drives, etc? -Jason

Hi again, thanks for all the replies to the all in one with ESXi, it was most illuminating. I will use this setup at my dayjob. Now for a slight variation on a theme: N40L with ESXi with raw drive passthrough, with OpenIndiana/napp-it NFS or iSCSI export of underlying devices. This particular setup is for a home VMWare lab, using spare hardware parts I have around. I''m trying to do something like http://forums.servethehome.com/showthread.php?464-HP-Micro...

...esday, January 3, 2017 1:50 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Network Attached Storage > > I've been using a HP Microserver for the last couple years as my home file > server, with FreeNAS, and 4x3TB drives. > > mine is one of the first generation N40L microservers, which I picked up > on deep discount when they were on clearance. I put 16GB ECC ram in > it, and its been working quite nicely. > > -- > john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz That is a nice looking unit but pricey. They are $867 with no drives on Newegg. Th...

On 10/28/2015 2:59 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > So I guess the strange IP address probably comes from some Lite-On device > somewhere in my house - maybe on the server itself, an HP MicroServer. My HP Microserver N40L (the original version), the NIC is Broadcom, 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5723 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe (rev 10) and its MAC is A0:B3:CC:xx:xx:xx -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

...would it be called? the "gen0" original microservers with the NxxL "Neo" processors have a OPTIONAL remote management card that implments IPMI and iLO. I don't have one in mine. here's someones blog about bringing his up. https://www.liquidstate.net/hp-microserver-n40l/ -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

...eason to move fileserver to guest if it's already up and running in production. In scenario i described earlier at first implementation I made 3 guests: dc, fileserver and asterisk. I had problems sharing 2GB of RAM for all of them. ksm gives some relief, but it eats CPU time and Turion II Neo N40L has not much of it. moving fileserever to host gave me resources to launch windows guest so i can manage dsa.msc gpmc.msc and etc. without freezing host. At first sight it may seem better to put a new service in virtual environment, but in the end of the day you just got another host to maintain (u...

Hello, Been thinking about either purchasing one of these or building my own. This will be for home use. I was looking at the QNAP 451+ or building (DYI NAS) one with FreeNAS. I also found that CentOS has a NAS project. Not sure which way to go. They would cost about the same. One would be proprietary and the other open source. I like open source. This for home use. Thought I'd start out

....3.5. Is the test taking a very long time? No, they don't take very long. > Is this a very slow system? Define 'very slow`. $ cat /proc/cpuinfo [6/6] processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 16 model : 6 model name : AMD Turion(tm) II Neo N40L Dual-Core Processor stepping : 3 microcode : 0x10000c8 cpu MHz : 800.000 cache size : 1024 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes...

...t; >B) a single USB drive is a very poor choice for any sort of server, >there's no redundancy whatsoever. When (not if) that drive croaks, >you lose everything. > >something like an HP Microserver is a much better choice for a SOHO >server. Been running one of the older N40L models here for 2+ >years, running FreeNAS, although it certainly can run CentOS. >supports 8 or 16GB ram, with ECC, and has 4 SATA drive bays. Mine >has 4x3TB in raidz (like raid5) for 7.3TiB total usable storage, I >have no trouble reading or writing at near gigE speeds. > &gt...

Hi, I was womdering, if anyone has experienced the same issues. When I run the tests after compiling 2.3.5, the following 4 tests fail: http payload echo (ssl): sequential .................................. : ok http payload echo (ssl): pipeline .................................... : ok http payload echo (ssl): parallel .................................... : FAILED: Test is hanging http payload

Folks The price point of Intel's NUC unit makes it attractive to use as a server that doesn't have significant computational load. In my environment, a USB connected hard-drive could provide all the storage needed. I wonder if anyone has had experience with it, and can answer: 1) Does Centos6 and/or Centos7 install from a USB connected optical drive? or a USB flash drive? I'd

I've been using a HP Microserver for the last couple years as my home file server, with FreeNAS, and 4x3TB drives. mine is one of the first generation N40L microservers, which I picked up on deep discount when they were on clearance. I put 16GB ECC ram in it, and its been working quite nicely. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

...Tuesday, January 3, 2017 1:50 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Network Attached Storage > > I've been using a HP Microserver for the last couple years as my home file > server, with FreeNAS, and 4x3TB drives. > > mine is one of the first generation N40L microservers, which I picked up > on deep discount when they were on clearance. I put 16GB ECC ram in > it, and its been working quite nicely. > > -- > john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz That is a nice looking unit but pricey. They are $867 with no drives on Newegg. Thi...

...t silent data corruption. B) a single USB drive is a very poor choice for any sort of server, there's no redundancy whatsoever. When (not if) that drive croaks, you lose everything. something like an HP Microserver is a much better choice for a SOHO server. Been running one of the older N40L models here for 2+ years, running FreeNAS, although it certainly can run CentOS. supports 8 or 16GB ram, with ECC, and has 4 SATA drive bays. Mine has 4x3TB in raidz (like raid5) for 7.3TiB total usable storage, I have no trouble reading or writing at near gigE speeds. Another good choice wou...

On 11/01/2015 07:40 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > ken wrote: > >> On 10/30/2015 09:01 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>>>> So I guess the strange IP address probably comes from some Lite-On >>>>> device somewhere in my house - maybe on the server itself, an HP >>>>> MicroServer. There are so many possible electronic culprits today. >>>>

Sounds like you have a host with a NIC that's configured for DHCP but either can't communicate with the DHCP server, or there are no free IPs for the DHCP server to give it. On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: > It's a Zero Config IP address. Most likely a host with zero config > enabled, pretty much all Windows by default, was

The most dramatic disadventage of kvm guest is block device I/O, so I wouldn't recommend to virtualize file server if it is not necessary. In my case on host ntpd configured as source for virtual dc, and bind9 configured as type=slave for zones hosted on dc, (make shure that srv records in _msdcs.mysambadomain.local are resolving when virtual dc is down) and smbd fileserver with

Morning all... I have a Dedicated server in a data center in Germany, and it has 2 3TB drives, but only software RAID. I have got them to install VMWare ESXi and so far everything is going ok... I have the 2 drives as standard data stores... But i am paranoid... So, i installed Nexenta as a VM, gave it a small disk to boot off and 2 1Tb disks on separate physical drives... I have created a

Hello, I'm slightly off-topic here, but it is somewhat CentOS related! I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services. 1) Low power consumption (10-15W ... maybe 30W at most) 2) Must run Linux without too much fuss (CentOS or otherwise) 3) Must have two NICs (fast ethernet or better) 4) Memory

This is problem 1 of 3 problems we are having with live migration and/or ACPI on Xen-4.3 and Xen-4.2. Any help would be appreciated. Detailed description of problem: We are using Xen-4.3-rc1 with dom0 running Ubuntu Precise and 3.5.0-23-generic kernel, and domU running Ubuntu Precise (12.04) cloud images running 3.2.0-39-virtual. We are using the xl.conf below on qemu-upstream-dm and HVM and