Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "n2588".
Did you mean:
2588
2008 May 02
0
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Sandro Magi <naasking at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, clicked send by accident. It seems there's some background I'm
> missing though. Can I read up on this "as-if" rule anywhere?
>
>From the latest C++0x draft (n2588), 1.9/1 [intro.execution]:
"The semantic descriptions in this International Standard define a
parameterized nondeterministic abstract machine. This International
Standard places no requirement on the structure of conforming
implementations. In particular, they need not copy or emulate the
stru...
2008 May 02
3
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null
Sorry, clicked send by accident. It seems there's some background I'm
missing though. Can I read up on this "as-if" rule anywhere?
I was just saying this translation seems safe for word-sized or
smaller objects, since those could end up being allocated to registers
and such. My confusion is over larger object sizes. At what point
would the translation not be done, or would it