search for: n2343

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "n2343".

Did you mean: 2343
2013 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...heck the Apache page summing up the compiler > capabilities by themselves. > > > -- Matthieu. > > > PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in. > > [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport > > [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" which drops > the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no known > version of gcc implements v1.1. > > [3]: "r-value v2.1 (n2844 + core issue 1138)" is subsided by "r-value v3.0 > (n3053...
2013 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...I would advise people who want a closer look to check the Apache page summing up the compiler capabilities by themselves. -- Matthieu. PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in. [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" which drops the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no known version of gcc implements v1.1. [3]: "r-value v2.1 (n2844 + core issue 1138)" is subsided by "r-value v3.0 (n3053)" but I could not...
2013 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...>> capabilities by themselves. >> >> >> -- Matthieu. >> >> >> PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in. >> >> [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport >> >> [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" which drops >> the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no known >> version of gcc implements v1.1. >> >> [3]: "r-value v2.1 (n2844 + core issue 1138)" is subsided by "r-value...
2013 Jan 11
4
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote: > > On 11.01.2013, at 20:08, Eli Bendersky wrote: > >>>> I suppose this tradeoff can be evaluated by looking at the delta >>>> between 4.5 and 4.6 which is actually supported by MSVC 2010 and Clang >>>> 3.1 >>> >>> Makes perfect sense to
2013 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...2] - local types as template arguments - r-value 2.0 [3] - static_assert - built-in type traits The only issue I can see is that a number of people emitted the idea that gcc 4.5 might be too advanced for a number of platforms (including RedHat for example). -- Matthieu [1]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" which drops the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no released version of gcc implements v1.1. [2]: "lambda v1.0 (n2658)" is subsided by "lambda v1.1 (n2927)", not sure of the exact impact of...
2013 Jan 13
5
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> Good points David, I don't feel qualified to evaluate the differences >> between those versions though... Perhaps Richard or Doug could comment here? > > Unless I'm misreading the buildbots, we don't actually have anything > trying to build with MSVC. Have we considered how
2013 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
...; > >> > >> -- Matthieu. > >> > >> > >> PS: thanks to Stephen Kelly for showing me how to use gmane to barge in. > >> > >> [1]: http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport > >> > >> [2]: "decltype v1.0 (n2343)" is subsided by "decltype v1.1 (n3276)" > which drops > >> the completeness requirement of return types; unfortunately it seems no > known > >> version of gcc implements v1.1. > >> > >> [3]: "r-value v2.1 (n2844 + core issue 1138)"...