Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "n2270".
Did you mean:
2270
2009 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] next
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>
>
>> "next" is a popular name; if it breaks llvm, I'd expect this standards change to break a lot of existing code. Do you really want to do that?
>>
>
> I'm happy to open an LWG issue for you on this subject. Here are directions on submitting an issue:
>
>
2009 Nov 16
4
[LLVMdev] next
On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote:
>
>> In many places there is code that looks like:
>>
>> MBBI = next(MBBI);
>>
>> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these
>> calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous:
>>