search for: mzamaz

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 14:14:32 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: > Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to clarify how to make snapshots of running VMs with > > emulated TPM devices. As far as I understand QEMU documentation, it's > > possible to make snapshots of running VMs with TPM, but it's importan...

Hi, I would like to clarify how to make snapshots of running VMs with emulated TPM devices. As far as I understand QEMU documentation, it's possible to make snapshots of running VMs with TPM, but it's important to retain the state of swtpm. Does libvirt assist with that in any way or is it completely user's responsibility? libvirt pauses the VM internally when making a snapshot,

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 17:54:23 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: > Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 14:14:32 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: > >> Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> writes: > >> > > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I would like to clarify how to make snapshots of running VMs with > >> > emulated TPM devices. As far as I understand QEMU documentation, it's > >> > possible...

Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:38:24 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 21:50:19 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> >> Hi, is there a reliable way to find out to what kind of job does the >> >> information returned from

Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Hi, >> > >> I've met two situations with NVDIMM support in libvirt where I'm not >> sure all the parties (libvirt & I) do the things correctly. >> >> The first problem is with memory alignment and size changes. In

Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> writes: > Hi, > > I would like to clarify how to make snapshots of running VMs with > emulated TPM devices. As far as I understand QEMU documentation, it's > possible to make snapshots of running VMs with TPM, but it's important > to retain the state of...

Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com> writes: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 14:14:32 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> writes: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I would like to clarify how to make snapshots of running VMs with >> > emulated TPM devices. As far as I understand QEMU documentation, it's >> > possible to make snapshots of running VMs wi...

Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> writes: > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: >>> The second problem is that a VM fails to start with a backing NVDIMM in >>> devdax mode due to SELinux preventing...

[Starting to move to the development list.] Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> writes: > Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> writes: > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:38:24 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: >>> >>> There are basically two problems: >>> >>> - When the job completion callback is called, I need to...

Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 12:18:32PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 03:38:25PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> >> Hi, I'm trying to add TLS migrations to oVirt, but I've hit a problem >> >> with

Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@redhat.com> writes: > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 12:18:32PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: >>> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes: >>> >> >>> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 03:...

Hi, we experienced a strange, non-reproducible error after a successful migration to another host. When we called virDomainDestroyFlags with VIR_DOMAIN_DESTROY_GRACEFUL flag after the migration on the source host, we got VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID (code 55) error. The same with repeated virDomainDestroyFlags calls. Normally, we would expect either success or VIR_ERR_NO_DOMAIN error. `virsh

Hi, I'm trying to use virConnectGetDomainCapabilities to get the list of CPUs compatible with the host CPU. I would like to further limit the list to CPUs of the same vendor as the host CPU. How can I do that? I tried to use virConnectBaselineCPU with <vendor> element and checking whether I obtain the same CPU, but that doesn't filter out CPUs without any vendor such as

Hi, when a normally running VM is migrated, libvirt sends VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_RESUMED_MIGRATED event on the destination once the migration completes. I can see that when a paused VM is migrated, libvirt sends VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_SUSPENDED_PAUSED instead. Since there seems to be nothing migration specific about VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_SUSPENDED_PAUSED event, my question is: Is it safe to assume on the

Hi, is there a reliable way to find out to what kind of job does the information returned from virDomainGetJobStats or provided in VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_JOB_COMPLETED event callback belong to? I'm specifically interested in distinguishing host-to-host migration jobs (e.g. those started by virDomainMigrateToUri* functions) from other jobs. If there is no better way, I'm thinking about

Hi, we have a problem in oVirt that highly available VMs don't restart after host poweroff because Vdsm identifies the case as a user initiated shutdown (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1800966). When poweroff is run on the host, libvirt-guests service takes an action. `virsh shutdown' is run on the VM, the guest OS is shut down cleanly and libvirt reports a shutdown event with

Hi, when working on hot unplugs of various devices, I've found out that hot unplugging <lease> device doesn't generate VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_DEVICE_REMOVED event. <lease> also doesn't have an alias, so it wouldn't be identifiable in the corresponding callback. Is this difference from other hotpluggable devices intentional? If yes, is there any better way of checking

"Daniel P. Berrange" <dan@berrange.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:35:22PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Hi, >> > >> we have a problem in oVirt that highly available VMs don't restart after >> host poweroff because Vdsm identifies the case as a user initiated >> shutdown (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1800966). >> >>

Hi, I'm playing with dynamic ownership and not all objects have their owners changed. Is dynamic_ownership and its scope documented somewhere, besides the comment in qemu.conf? And what kinds of objects are handled by dynamic ownership? While some objects seem to be handled, other objects are apparently unaffected. For instance /dev/hwrng or a USB host device keep their root owners and are

"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:55:13AM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote: >> Hi, we experienced a strange, non-reproducible error after a successful >> migration to another host. When we called virDomainDestroyFlags with >> VIR_DOMAIN_DESTROY_GRACEFUL flag after the migration on the source host, >> we got