search for: mytype

With primitive types, I can interchange literal usage and type aliases in IR: %mytype = type i32 define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store i32 *%t1*, *i32** %ptr ret void } But for structs, I cannot: %mytype = type { i32, i32 } define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store* { i32, i32 }* %t1, *{ i32, i32 }** %ptr ret void...

...ypes. What I've found is that none of the options yield the expected results for the input code (see below). Except for the indirect case, the function signature is changed to take each structure element. How can I modify LLVM to pass structures by value? Thanks, Javier [Original Code] struct myType { long val; }; int convert(struct myType in) { return (int)in.val; } [Expected Result] define i32 @convert(%myType %in) nounwind readonly alwaysinline{ entry: %in.addr = alloca %myType, align 8 store %myType %in, %myType* %in.addr, align 8 %0 = getelementptr inbounds %myType* %in.addr, i...

...eral types, aka unnamed StructType(s)." ? See also; http://blog.llvm.org/2011/11/llvm-30-type-system-rewrite.html ...Takumi 2012/12/30 Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com>: > With primitive types, I can interchange literal usage and type aliases in > IR: > > %mytype = type i32 > > define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { > %t1 = load %mytype* %ptr > store i32 %t1, i32* %ptr > ret void > } > > But for structs, I cannot: > > %mytype = type { i32, i32 } > > define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { > %t1 = load %mytype* %ptr >...

Dear R users, Suppose I have the following data.frame: myID myType myNum1 myNum2 myNum3 a Single 10 11 12 b Single 15 25 35 c Double 22 33 44 d Double 4 6 8 and I want to have new records: myID myType myNum1 myNum2 myNum3 e Single...

Dear R-users, I am trying to use the grep function to test whether a particular string is of the form "n.../mydir/myfile.mytype.myext". Anything between n and mytype could vary, and anything after mytype could vary. I tried to proceed by steps to build my regular expression... but I do not really understand why the last call of the following code do not work. Any help would be greatly appreciated. mystr <- &quo...

...ode (see below). Except for the indirect case, the function > signature is changed to take each structure element. How can I modify LLVM > to pass structures by value?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > Javier**** > > ** ** > > [Original Code]**** > > struct myType {**** > > long val;**** > > };**** > > int convert(struct myType in)**** > > {**** > > return (int)in.val;**** > > }**** > > ** ** > > [Expected Result]**** > > define i32 @convert(%myType %in) nounwind readonly alwaysinline{**** > > e...

...at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> +1 Exactly this. >> I don't think C programmer will not understand using. The "=" makes it much >> simpler to read, even if it is the first time you see it, which is not the >> case of typedef. >> >> typedef MyType::NestedType (*fptr)(const MyOhterType&); >> or >> using fptr = MyType::NestedType (*)(const MyOhterType&); > I would prefer to please keep using typedefs at least for function pointers. I find either of typedef MyType::NestedType (*fptr)(const MyOhterType&); or typed...

...exercises model includes " has_many :templates ". The problem comes when I try to make the Template model available in the view. First, in the view, I debug @mytemplate = --- - !ruby/object:Template attributes: text8: number4: "1" exercise_id: "1" mytype: f id: "1" (etc...) This is the correct information being passed to the view - note that the debug headers are identical except for the base class name! - but from here on I can only access this information in the view by using ''debug''. For instance: Trying to...

Hi all, I''m struggling with the following: I have a defined type wrapped in a class: class myclass { define mytype(bla) { file { "blabla": .... } exec { "blablabla": ... } } } And I access the defined type in my other class by doing this: class otherclass { include myclass myclass::mytype { "alb": ... } # and here I want to require my defined type: f...

.... >> >> I don't think C programmer will not understand using. The "=" makes it >> much >> >> simpler to read, even if it is the first time you see it, which is not >> the >> >> case of typedef. >> >> >> >> typedef MyType::NestedType (*fptr)(const MyOhterType&); >> >> or >> >> using fptr = MyType::NestedType (*)(const MyOhterType&); >> > >> >> I would prefer to please keep using typedefs at least for function >> pointers. I find either of >> >>...

...n sun_positions; as last line doesn't. Am I doing something wrong here? I did do the declaration before including <Rcpp.h>. 2) How to make as work for own types in containers The other way around, one can return a std::vector<double> implicitly, but how do I return std::vector<MyType>? I tried to define template<> MyType as(SEXP); But that didn't help, e.g. I had to write my own template<> std::vector<MyType> as(SEXP); Thanks for help Florian [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...t introduce for the moment noise. Two main problems come from the idea above are sizeof() (for allocation, passing by value/reference) and offsets of data members. Let's ignore for the moment sizeof related problems and just look at offsets. At the moment if we have class A { private: MyType data; public: MyType &getData() {return data} void setData(MyType &in) {data = in;} }; The above setters/getters can be easily inlined by the compiler to avoid a function call for such a trivial case. /* inside A.h */ class white A { public: MyType &getData()...

...is much better for these, but that can be a matter of taste). > > — > Mehdi > +1 Exactly this. I don't think C programmer will not understand using. The "=" makes it much simpler to read, even if it is the first time you see it, which is not the case of typedef. typedef MyType::NestedType (*fptr)(const MyOhterType&); or using fptr = MyType::NestedType (*)(const MyOhterType&); Typedefs with function pointers are used in couple of places in LLVM and I find it terible to read. So it is not about new-ness. Trust me, I would never use typedef if using was first :) -...

Is there any API in LLVM that can represent the field in java. such as the instucion "iget vx, vy, field_id" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130716/81e59a4a/attachment.html>

Let''s start with this: class whatever ( $myType=''other'' ) { file { "some-config-file": ... content => $myType ? { ''this'' => template("whatever/this.erb"), ''that'' => template("whatever/that.erb"),...

On 4 Jun 2020, at 0:54, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > While MLIR may be one part of the solution, I think it's also the case > that > the function-ABI interface between Clang and LLVM is just wrong and > should > be fixed -- independently of whether Clang might use MLIR in the > future. > > I've mentioned this idea before, I think, but never got around to

...39;m wondering how, when using IRBuilder, one can can it to emit a recursive type definition? The code for TypeBuilder explicitly states that it doesn't handle recursive types... I'm after being able to emit, programmatically, stuff like the Named Types example in the Language Reference: %mytype = type { %mytype*, i32 } I'd welcome any advice! Yours, James Jackson. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130217/030988e7/attachment.html>

Hello. I have an .bc, which defines @foo(%type* arg1, %type* arg2, %type* arg3). Firstly, i do this: runtimeModule = getLazyIRFileModule("runtime.bc", smd, llctx); then this: fooFunction = runtimeModule->getFunction("foo"); myType = runtimeModule->getTypeByName("type"); After that, i'm creating another module: myModule = new Module("My Module", llctx); and create some AllocaInsts with type %type: AllocaInst * retZval = new AllocaInst(myType, "arg1&...

still pretty new to Ruby, please bare with me :) Say I have a module with a custom type, structured like so: [modules]/mymodule/manifests/init.pp [modules]/mymodule/lib/puppet/provider/mytype/foo.rb [modules]/mymodule/lib/puppet/type/mytype.rb In foo.rb, I''d like to call some custom ruby functions in a module and/ or class. These are generic functions that may be used in other modules, e.g. md5.rb with a collection of MD5 functions/methods. I was thinking a generic ''...

...or this type? I wrote a small example to illustrate: ; ModuleID = 'myexample.bc' target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128" target triple = "x86_64-pc-linux" %mytype = type <{<3 x i32>, i32}> define void @myexample(%mytype* %src, i64 %index, i32* %result) { entry: %vectoraddr = getelementptr %mytype* %src, i64 %index, i32 0 %vector = load <3 x i32>* %vectoraddr %tmp1 = extractelement <3 x i32> %vector, i32...