Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "mysappli".
Did you mean:
mysapply
2018 Mar 13
4
Possible Improvement to sapply
While working with sapply, the documentation states that the simplify argument will yield a vector, matrix etc "when possible". I was curious how the code actually defined "as possible" and see this within the function
if (!identical(simplify, FALSE) && length(answer))
This seems superfluous to me, in particular this part:
!identical(simplify, FALSE)
The preceding
2018 Mar 13
0
Possible Improvement to sapply
Wouldn't that change how simplify='array' is handled?
> str(sapply(1:3, function(x)diag(x,5,2), simplify="array"))
int [1:5, 1:2, 1:3] 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ...
> str(sapply(1:3, function(x)diag(x,5,2), simplify=TRUE))
int [1:10, 1:3] 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ...
> str(sapply(1:3, function(x)diag(x,5,2), simplify=FALSE))
List of 3
$ : int [1:5, 1:2] 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
2018 Mar 13
1
Possible Improvement to sapply
You?re right, it sure does. My suggestion causes it to fail when simplify = ?array?
From: William Dunlap [mailto:wdunlap at tibco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:11 PM
To: Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org>
Cc: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R] Possible Improvement to sapply
Wouldn't that change how simplify='array' is handled?
> str(sapply(1:3,
2018 Mar 13
0
Possible Improvement to sapply
On 03/13/2018 09:23 AM, Doran, Harold wrote:
> While working with sapply, the documentation states that the simplify argument will yield a vector, matrix etc "when possible". I was curious how the code actually defined "as possible" and see this within the function
>
> if (!identical(simplify, FALSE) && length(answer))
>
> This seems superfluous to me,
2018 Mar 13
2
Possible Improvement to sapply
Martin
In terms of context of the actual problem, sapply is called millions of times because the work involves scoring individual students who took a test. A score for student A is generated and then student B and such and there are millions of students. The psychometric process of scoring students is complex and our code makes use of sapply many times for each student.
The toy example used
2018 Mar 13
1
Possible Improvement to sapply
Could your code use vapply instead of sapply? vapply forces you to declare
the type and dimensions
of FUN's output and stops if any call to FUN does not match the
declaration. It can use much less
memory and time than sapply because it fills in the output array as it goes
instead of calling lapply()
and seeing how it could be simplified.
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
On Tue,
2018 Mar 13
0
Possible Improvement to sapply
Quite possibly, and I?ll look into that. Aside from the work I was doing, however, I wonder if there is a way such that sapply could avoid the overhead of having to call the identical function to determine the conditional path.
From: William Dunlap [mailto:wdunlap at tibco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:14 PM
To: Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org>
Cc: Martin Morgan <martin.morgan
2018 Mar 13
2
Possible Improvement to sapply
FYI, in R devel (to become 3.5.0), there's isFALSE() which will cut
some corners compared to identical():
> microbenchmark::microbenchmark(identical(FALSE, FALSE), isFALSE(FALSE))
Unit: nanoseconds
expr min lq mean median uq max neval
identical(FALSE, FALSE) 984 1138 1694.13 1218.0 1337.5 13584 100
isFALSE(FALSE) 713 761 1133.53 809.5 871.5