search for: mypool

$ zfs list -t filesystem NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 840M 25.5G 21K /datapool datapool/virtualbox 839M 25.5G 839M /virtualbox mypool 8.83G 6.92G 82K /mypool mypool/ROOT 5.48G 6.92G 21K legacy mypool/ROOT/May25-2010-Image-Update 5.48G 6.92G 4.12G / mypool/ROOT/OpenSolaris-Latest 1.42M 6.92G 4.07G / mypool/export 2.41G 6.92G 22...

Hello folks, I have a question and a small problem... I did try to replicate my zfs with all the snaps, so I did run few commands: time zfs send mypool/d at 2006_month_10 | zfs receive mypool2/d at 2006_month_10 real 6h35m12.34s user 0m0.00s sys 29m32.28s zfs send -i mypool/d at 2006_month_10 mypool/d at 2006_month_12 | zfs receive mypool/d at 2006_month_12 real 4h49m27.54s user 0m0.00s sys 13m40.87s zfs send -i mypool/d at...

On 29/10/2007, Tek Bahadur Limbu <teklimbu at wlink.com.np> wrote: > I created a ZFS file system like the following with /mypool/cache being > the partition for the Squid cache: > > 18:51:27 root at solaris:~$ zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > mypool 478M 31.0G 10.0M /mypool > mypool/cache 230M 9.78G 230M /mypool/cache > mypool/home...

...If i try to remove a specific file, i got: # rm file1 rm: file1: No such file or directory # rm -rf dir2 rm: Unable to remove directory dir2: Directory not empty Take a look: ------- cut here -------- # ls dir1 dir2 # ls dir2/ file1 # ls -i 5147 dir1 1924 dir2 # zdb -dddd mypool/myfs 1924 ... Object lvl iblk dblk lsize asize type 1924 1 16K 1K 1K 1K ZFS directory 264 bonus ZFS znode path /myfs/dir2 uid 0 gid 12 atime Tue Dec 9 16:07:03 2008 mtime...

Hello folks, I have strange and unusual request... I have two 300gig drives mirrored: [11:33:22] root at chrysek: /d/d2 > zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: N...

...e is subject to license terms. Hardware watchdog enabled Hostname: chrysek /kernel/drv/sparcv9/zpool symbol avl_add multiply defined /kernel/drv/sparcv9/zpool symbol assfail3 multiply defined WARNING: kstat_create(''unix'', 0, ''dmu_buf_impl_t''): namespace collision mypool2/d3 uncorrectable error checking ufs filesystems /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s7: is logging. When my system is booting it does complain about mypool2/d3 mypool2/d3 uncorrectable error but when system boots and I do [11:31:01] root at chrysek: /root > mount /d/d3 [11:31:06] root at chrysek: /root > df -...

...GB hard drives and 2x 320 GB hard drives available, and I want to set up a RAIDZ for the 750 GB and mirror for the 320 GB and add it all to the same pool. I tested detaching a drive and it seems to seriously mess up the entire pool and I can''t figure out a way to recover. # zpool create mypool raidz c1t1d0 c1t2d0 c1t3d0 # zpool add -f mypool mirror c1t4d0 c1t5d0 # zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0...

Hi Is it possible to convert live 3 disks zpool from raidz to raidz2 And is it possible to add 1 new disk to raidz configuration without backups and recreating zpool from cratch. Thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi forum, I''m currently a little playing around with ZFS on my workstation. I created a standard mirrored pool over 2 disk-slices. # zpool status Pool: mypool Status: ONLINE scrub: Keine erforderlich config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0s4 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0s4 ONLINE 0 0 0...

hello folks, I am running Solaris 10 U3 and I have small problem that I dont know how to fix... I had a pool of two drives: bash-3.00# zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 emcpower0a ONLINE 0 0 0 emcpower1a ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors I added another dri...

...commands. Learnt format/partition etc. And then, I wanted to move this stuff to a solaris partition on the physical disk. VB provides physical disk access. I put my solaris partition in there and created slices for root, swap etc. in that partition inside the OpenSolaris VM. Created a pool called mypool on slice 0 of this solaris partition and did a zfs send|recv of my rpool/ROOT and rpool/export into the mypool. Verified that the data was correctly copied and mountpoints were set exactly like they are for rpool. Next, edited the files in /mypool/boot and /mypool/etc to use the new name mypool in...

Hi, I do have a disk array that is providing striped LUNs to my Solaris box. Hence I''d like to simply concat those LUNs without adding another layer of striping. Is this possibile with ZFS? As far as I understood, if I use zpool create myPool lun-1 lun-2 ... lun-n I will get a RAID0 striping where each data block is split across all "n" LUNs. If that''s correct, is there a way to avoid that and get ZFS to write sequentially on the LUNs that are part of myPool? Thanks, Piero -- This message posted from opensolar...

...makes sense to me because of the integration of NFS and iSCSI with the sharenfs and shareiscsi properties. Since these are both dependent on an IP it would be pretty cool if there was also a virtual IP that would automatically move with the pool. Maybe something like "zfs set ip.nge0=x.x.x.x mypool" Or since we may have different interfaces on the nodes where we want to move the zpool... zfs set ip.server1.nge0=x.x.x.x mypool zfs set ip.server2.bge0=x.x.x.x mypool I know this could be handled with Sun Cluster but if I am only building a simple storage appliance to serve NFS and iSCSI...

I''d like to replace/upgrade two 500GB disks in RaidZ2 vdev with 1TB disks, but I have some preliminary questions/concerns before trying ''zfs replace dpool ?'' Will ZFS permit this replacement? Will ZFS use the extra space in a heterogeneous RaidZ2 vdev, or is the size limited by the smallest disk in the vdev? Thanks in advance, Vizzini The system is currently running

Hi All, ZPOOL / ZFS commands writes EFI label on a device if we create ZPOOL/ZFS fs on it. Is it true ? I formatted a device with VTOC lable and I created a ZFS file system on it. Now which label the ZFS device has ? is it old VTOC or EFI ? After creating the ZFS file system on a VTOC labeled disk, I am seeing the following warning messages. Feb 3 07:47:00 scoobyb

...an''t currently have any of the create time only properties set: The examples below use the normalization property but this applies to all properties that are create time only. Attempt to set a create time only dataset property at pool creation time: # zpool create -o normalization=formC mypool /tmp/f property ''normalization'' is not a valid pool property This isn''t unexpected though because we can''t set dataset properties with zpool(1M), however: Create the pool and then attempt to set the property on the top level dataset: # zpool create mypool /tmp...

...an''t currently have any of the create time only properties set: The examples below use the normalization property but this applies to all properties that are create time only. Attempt to set a create time only dataset property at pool creation time: # zpool create -o normalization=formC mypool /tmp/f property ''normalization'' is not a valid pool property This isn''t unexpected though because we can''t set dataset properties with zpool(1M), however: Create the pool and then attempt to set the property on the top level dataset: # zpool create mypool /tmp...

I skimmed the archives and found a thread from July earlier this year about RAIDZ expansion. Not adding more RAIDZ stripes to a pool, but adding more drives to the stripe itself. I''m wondering if an RFE has been submitted for this and if any progress has been made, or is expected? I find myself out of space on my current RAID5 setup and would love to flip over to a ZFS raidz2 solution

...colon-separated arguments in my disk source 'name' attribute to control the RBD cache settings on a per-volume basis. Under libvirt-1.0.6 such VM's refuse to start: error: Failed to start domain foo error: unsupported configuration: ':' not allowed in RBD source volume name 'mypool/foo:rbd_cache_size=268435456:rbd_cache_max_dirty=134217728:rbd_cache_target_dirty=33554432:rbd_cache_max_dirty_age=5' So my question is how do I control the cache settings now? Thanks, JN

In my testing, I''ve found the following error: zpool status -v pool: local state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the entire pool from backup. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-8A scrub: none requested