Displaying 20 results from an estimated 21 matches for "myopt".
Did you mean:
mopt
2008 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] Requiring a pass to run before/after a pass? (Adding PHIs and updating uses)
Is there a simple way to require a pass, e.g., Reg2Mem/Mem2Reg, to run
before/after my transformation pass? Or do I do something like:
struct myOpt {
myOpt() {
mBefore = createDemoteRegisterToMemoryPass();
mAfter = createPromoteMemoryToRegisterPass();
}
getAnalysisUsage(AU) {
AU.addRequired(my stuff);
mBefore.getAnalysisUsage(AU);
mAfter.getAnalysisUsage(AU);
}
runOnFunction(aF) {
changed = mBefore(F);
d...
2011 Nov 10
3
optim seems to be finding a local minimum
...}
### Function to be optimized;
### param is a vector of 2 values (.alpha and .beta)
myfunc <- function(param){
myalpha<-param[1]
mybeta<-param[2]
IVtransf<-transformIV(myalpha, mybeta)
sumofdevs<-mysum(myIV=IVtransf,myDV=DV)
return(sumofdevs)
}
# Optimizing using optim:
myopt <- optim(fn=myfunc, par=c(0.1,max(IV)), method="L-BFGS-B", lower=0)
(myopt)
myfunc(myopt$par)
## Comparing this solution to Excel Solver solution:
myfunc(c(0.888452533990788,94812732.0897449))
--
Dimitri Liakhovitski
marketfusionanalytics.com
2008 Aug 27
1
RCurl: using netrc with curlPerform
...m function I get an error
saying that the curl option is not recognized. I have tried 3 different
ways of instructing the curlPerform function to use the .netrc file (in
the .opts, curl handle and the ... argument) but got the same error
message each time.
# Failed attempt using .opts construct
myopts <-curlOptions(netrc=1)
curlPerform("http://www.omegahat.org/RCurl/testPassword/index.html",
.opts=myopts)
# Failed attempt using curl handle
handle <- getCurlHandle(netrc=1)
curlPerform("http://www.omegahat.org/RCurl/testPassword/index.html",
curl=handle)
# Failed att...
2008 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Requiring a pass to run before/after a pass? (Adding PHIs and updating uses)
...imple way to require a pass, e.g., Reg2Mem/Mem2Reg, to
> run before/after my transformation pass? Or do I do something like:
One simplest way is to handle this is to add these passes around your
pass in the pass manager.
pm.add(Reg2Mem)
pm.add(MyPass)
pm.add(Mem2Reg)
>
>
> struct myOpt {
> myOpt() {
> mBefore = createDemoteRegisterToMemoryPass();
> mAfter = createPromoteMemoryToRegisterPass();
> }
>
> getAnalysisUsage(AU) {
> AU.addRequired(my stuff);
> mBefore.getAnalysisUsage(AU);
> mAfter.getAnalysisUsage(AU);
> }
>...
2016 Dec 13
0
Enabling statistics in release builds / static constructors
...e storage for the options being hold in the context somehow (old memories, not sure about the details).
CC Chris who likely has more information (and possibly pointers).
—
Mehdi
> So here comes the strawman:
>
>
> static Statistic NumBlips("blips");
> static cl::opt MyOpt("my-cool-option", cl::desc("bla"));
> static cl::opt AnotherOpt("bla", cl::desc("foo bar"));
> // Note that the constructors of Statistic and cl::opt would be reworked to be pure constexpr and do not run any code
>
> static void init_globals() {...
2016 Dec 13
3
Enabling statistics in release builds / static constructors
...r/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms.
We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code!
So here comes the strawman:
static Statistic NumBlips("blips");
static cl::opt MyOpt("my-cool-option", cl::desc("bla"));
static cl::opt AnotherOpt("bla", cl::desc("foo bar"));
// Note that the constructors of Statistic and cl::opt would be reworked to be pure constexpr and do not run any code
static void init_globals() {
NumBlips.init();...
2016 Dec 13
2
Enabling statistics in release builds / static constructors
...global.
- Matthias
[1] Please someone please give us an easier time to access old mails when you just have the old link...
>
> Mehdi
>
>
>
>> So here comes the strawman:
>>
>>
>> static Statistic NumBlips("blips");
>> static cl::opt MyOpt("my-cool-option", cl::desc("bla"));
>> static cl::opt AnotherOpt("bla", cl::desc("foo bar"));
>> // Note that the constructors of Statistic and cl::opt would be reworked to be pure constexpr and do not run any code
>>
>> static void i...
2007 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] User-specified JIT passes
...taking lli, copying it, and tuning it into the tool that you'd like
it to be. I'd like to keep lli simple and focused on what it does,
which is provide primitive command line access to the jit/interpreter.
Note that you can potentially just use a shell script which does:
opt foo.bc -myopt | lli ...
-Chris
2007 Oct 29
2
[LLVMdev] User-specified JIT passes
Greetings,
I have a plan to use LLVM to undertake runtime optimisation of
computational chemistry programs. As part of this, I'd like to be able
to invoke lli and pass it a list of passes to run, in the manner of
opt. For example:
> lli -load=llvm/mem_trace_pass/bin/lib/hello.so -hello ./my_bitcode.bc
The current implementation of lli (updated from SVN as of three nights
ago)
2016 Dec 13
0
Enabling statistics in release builds / static constructors
Given that LLVM has so many auto-registration systems (cl::opt, target
registry, pass registry, statistics, I'm sure there's more), maybe we
should spend the time to build an auto-registration system that doesn't
involve static constructors?
It needs custom code for every supported object file format, and is hard to
get right when DSOs are involved, but in the long run it's
2011 Jun 01
2
[LLVMdev] How best to time passes using the API instead of opt? Also, memory leaks when trying to do timing in the API.
...Group's removeTimer method is never called, nor is it's
destructor (but it's constructor is).
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Andrew Clinton <andrew at sidefx.com> wrote:
> I got it working with this:
>
> int argc = 2;
> const char *argv[2] = {"myopt", "-time-passes"};
>
> cl::ParseCommandLineOptions(argc, (char **)argv, "my optimizer");
>
> On 06/01/2011 01:19 PM, Michael Ilseman wrote:
>> I have some PassManagers, and I would like to output timing data for
>> how long each pass takes to exe...
2011 Jun 01
0
[LLVMdev] How best to time passes using the API instead of opt? Also, memory leaks when trying to do timing in the API.
I got it working with this:
int argc = 2;
const char *argv[2] = {"myopt", "-time-passes"};
cl::ParseCommandLineOptions(argc, (char **)argv, "my optimizer");
On 06/01/2011 01:19 PM, Michael Ilseman wrote:
> I have some PassManagers, and I would like to output timing data for
> how long each pass takes to execute with a separate appl...
2011 Jun 01
0
[LLVMdev] How best to time passes using the API instead of opt? Also, memory leaks when trying to do timing in the API.
...s never called, nor is it's
> destructor (but it's constructor is).
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Andrew Clinton<andrew at sidefx.com> wrote:
>> I got it working with this:
>>
>> int argc = 2;
>> const char *argv[2] = {"myopt", "-time-passes"};
>>
>> cl::ParseCommandLineOptions(argc, (char **)argv, "my optimizer");
>>
>> On 06/01/2011 01:19 PM, Michael Ilseman wrote:
>>> I have some PassManagers, and I would like to output timing data for
>>> how lo...
2011 Jun 01
2
[LLVMdev] How best to time passes using the API instead of opt? Also, memory leaks when trying to do timing in the API.
I have some PassManagers, and I would like to output timing data for
how long each pass takes to execute with a separate application using
the API, rather than through an llvm tool. Unfortunately, I'm having
trouble seeing how to use the existing facilities without using opt.
Setting llvm::TimePassesIsEnabled before creating the PassManagers
doesn't seem to output anything, though it is
2016 Dec 13
0
Enabling statistics in release builds / static constructors
...ve us an easier time to access old mails when you just have the old link...
>
>
>>
>> Mehdi
>>
>>
>>
>>> So here comes the strawman:
>>>
>>>
>>> static Statistic NumBlips("blips");
>>> static cl::opt MyOpt("my-cool-option", cl::desc("bla"));
>>> static cl::opt AnotherOpt("bla", cl::desc("foo bar"));
>>> // Note that the constructors of Statistic and cl::opt would be reworked to be pure constexpr and do not run any code
>>>
>>&g...
2006 Mar 07
17
[UNDER CONSTRUCTION] YAC? (Yet Another Capistrano)
My needs are far more modest than Capistrano''s capabilities. Also, when
working in a shared hosting environment, the Capistrano model can be
outside the capabilities allowed by the Web host.
I simply need to push selected directories (on a changed-file basis) out
to a server. I have about 80% of the code written to do this (I''m
considering YAC for the name, with a nod to
2013 Sep 17
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Internal command line options should not be statically initialized.
...zation with all the convenient flags and parameters, but refer to a globally defined option storage that enforces the singleton and provides visibility. As long as pass initialization happens before parseCommandLine, usage should be consistent.
>
> Strawman:
>
> cl::optval<bool> MyOption; // Just the storage, no initialization.
>
> MyPass() {
> // Only registers an option with the same optval once.
> Option cl::registerOpt(MyOption, cl::init(false), cl::Hidden,
> cl::desc("Descriptive string..."), );
> }
Given Chandler's...
2006 May 23
10
throttling...
Is there a way to throttle the firing of updater requests easily with
Prototype?
Thanks,
mark
2016 Aug 31
3
llvm::cl::opt and enums
I was adding a new option for our backend, and because of the nature of the
option I wanted to use an 'enum', something like:
enum Direction {
left,
right,
up,
down
};
cl:opt<Direction> myOpt("option-switch", cl::init(up), cl::desc("what it
does"), cl::Hidden);
This bit is fine, but then I wanted to change it on the command-line to
'clang' and tried:
clang ... -mllvm -option-switch=3 ...
but that doesn't work, and I get something like "inval...
1997 May 22
2
R-alpha: options(..) vs. .Options // Re(1i) = 2.4976e-307
...>> This is not a bug report, rather than some remarks as a
>> "request for comments":
>>
>> It is clear that options( foo = bar )
>> sets the option and also updates the builtin() .Options list :
>>
>> > options(myopt = pi)
>> > .Options$my
>> [1] 3.14159265
>>
>> In S-plus, it was (is) possible to use .Options locally in a function
>> frame in order to just affect some options during evaluation of that
>> function.
Ross> I have made some ch...