search for: mykland

...he following: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=<cfebuilddir>/gcc <insert xgcc command line here> Then it will run xgcc so that it will find the new (buggy) libgcc.so Hopefully that will reproduce the problem and you can then get a stack trace from cc1 Reid. On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 10:45 -0800, Robert Mykland wrote: > Reid, > > I followed the steps but got stuck as described below: > > Reid Spencer wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > Please make sure that you: > > > > 1. Completely rebuild LLVM (make clean; make reconfigure; make > > tools-only) > &gt...

...<pre wrap=""> If you've done that, then please enter the debugger and get a stack trace for us. You will need to: 1. Capture the xgcc compile command that failed </pre> </blockquote> <b>I captured this command and it is:</b><br> <br> /home/mykland/llvm-gcc/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/home/mykland/llvm-gcc/obj/gcc/ -B/home/mykland/llvm-gcc/obj/../install//i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/mykland/llvm-gcc/obj/../install//i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /home/mykland/llvm-gcc/obj/../install//i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem /home/mykland/llvm-gcc/obj/../in...

...e/gcc/toplev.c:1171<br> #14 0x08096ad2 in main (argc=-1209859528, argv=0xb7e30240)<br>     at ../../llvm-gcc4-1.8-source/gcc/llvm-main.cpp:37<br> <br> The command looked like this in gdb when it failed:<br> <br> (gdb) file cc1<br> Reading symbols from /home/mykland/llvm-gcc/obj/gcc/cc1...done.<br> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".<br> (gdb) run -quiet -v -I. -I. -I../../llvm-gcc4-1.8-source/gcc -I../../llvm-gcc4-1.8-source/gcc/. -I../../llvm-gcc4-1.8-source/gcc/../include -I../../llvm-gcc4-1.8-source/gcc/../libcpp...

Hi Robert, On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 12:45 -0800, Robert Mykland wrote: > Reid, > > Here's the backtrace you asked for: > > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0862d65c in llvm::LiveVariables::runOnMachineFunction () Hmm, this is a little strange. Your LLVM build is non-debug (there's no line numbers or arguments in any of the llvm related calls). Howe...

...d to: 1. Capture the xgcc compile command that failed 2. Run that command manually with the -v option to print out the commands it is running 3. Debug gcc/cc1 and run it with the arguments shown in step 2 4. Get a stack trace with "where" Reid. On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 20:15 -0800, Robert Mykland wrote: > I was having video problems, so upgraded my Linux box from SUSE 9.3, > where LLVM frontend 4 source built fine, to SUSE 10.1, where I got the > error message: > > ../../llvm-gcc4-1.8-source/gcc/libgcc2.c:541: internal compiler error: > Segmentation fault > Please s...

I was having video problems, so upgraded my Linux box from SUSE 9.3, where LLVM frontend 4 source built fine, to SUSE 10.1, where I got the error message: ../../llvm-gcc4-1.8-source/gcc/libgcc2.c:541: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <URL:http://llvm.org/bugs> for instructions. This version of SUSE

...ode generator processes, though, which is far from all of them. As I get farther along with my code generator I expect I'll get to the point where everything kind of fits together for me and I can finish it up. In the meantime, people are welcome to what I have so far. -- Robert. Robert Mykland Voice: (831) 462-6725

...)? Function returning Int ( ... )? and 0e 07 00 Function returning Int () I'm guessing the former really is a function returning Int ( ... ), but how is the callee supposed to decode the parameter list? I'm an old callee and I don't know this new trick. :-) -- Robert. Robert Mykland Voice: (831) 462-6725

On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:25:23AM -0800, Robert Mykland wrote: > I'm the guy who is working on the LLVM bytecode documentation. The > document I have at present just supports the bytecodes my code > generator processes, though, which is far from all of them. As I get > farther along with my code generator I expect I'll get to the poi...

On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 19:46, Robert Mykland wrote: > At 06:43 PM 8/20/2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > >I don't understand what you're getting at here. You can change char to > >default to unsigned right now with llvm-gcc -funsigned-char. I don't > >understand how that would change anything to be more useful th...

At 06:43 PM 8/20/2004, Chris Lattner wrote: >On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Robert Mykland wrote: > > >In any case, both signed and unsigned 8-bit constants can be written out > > >in a single byte. Again, do you think it's worth special casing this > > >though? Considering that we handle 8-bit strings specially already, there > > >are not a ton...

On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 17:55, Robert Mykland wrote: > At 05:09 PM 8/20/2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > >If you're interested in the plans, they are described in some detail here: > >http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemChanges.txt > > > >Note that there is no concrete timeline for this to happen, i...

At 09:37 PM 8/23/2004, you wrote: >On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 19:46, Robert Mykland wrote: > > At 06:43 PM 8/20/2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > >I don't understand what you're getting at here. You can change char to > > >default to unsigned right now with llvm-gcc -funsigned-char. I don't > > >understand how that would change anything...

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Robert Mykland wrote: > >In any case, both signed and unsigned 8-bit constants can be written out > >in a single byte. Again, do you think it's worth special casing this > >though? Considering that we handle 8-bit strings specially already, there > >are not a ton of 8-bit constants w...

...>From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> >Precedence: list >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Bytecode file bugs / doc bugs >Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:56:22 -0700 >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040816131856.02beba60 at mail.mykland.com> >In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040816131856.02beba60 at mail.mykland.com> >Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >Message-ID: <1092704181.19366.307.camel at bashful.x10sys.com> >Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; >...

Dear All, Are there any packages in R to carry out the jump detection test and find the jump sizes and its its time of occurence on high frequency data(5 minute interval) using non-parametric approach suggested by Lee and Mykland in their paper "Jumps in Financial Markets: A New Nonparametric Test and Jump Dynamics". Regards and Thanks in advance, Rahul [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...e the function could look at a static variable somewhere to get this data. That sounds messy. Are these functions member functions with an implied first parameter perhaps? If so, why not explicitly? -- Robert. At 04:17 PM 8/26/2003 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: >On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Robert Mykland wrote: > > And while we're on the subject to the type definitions table, what's the > > difference between > > > > 0e 07 01 00 > > function returning Int ( Void )? Function returning Int ( ... )? > >Void is not a legal argument. The bytecode file uses t...

...k to merge the symbol tables because they would probably collide name spaces. Seperate modules would make it simple. But as I said before, you could still dump the 0x01 and have multiple modules per file so that each module in a debug library could have its own name space. -- Robert. Robert Mykland Voice: (831) 462-6725 Founder/CTO Ascenium Corporation

...enchmarks and most of the Standard C Library (including printf()) using a pure data dependency simulator where we can evaluate the circuit in a random order and we get the correct answer every time. We are pretty pleased. This is running on version 1.8 of LLVM. Cheers, -- Robert. -- Robert Mykland Voice: (831) 462-6725 Founder/CTO Ascenium Corporation "A new world of computing fulfilling people's lives"

...t; tvbxbbf stg >ohuzk > >--4_5.F0_6C_AC__4A482B1_A-- > > > >--__--__-- > >_______________________________________________ >LLVMdev mailing list >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu >http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > >End of LLVMdev Digest Robert Mykland Voice: (831) 462-6725