Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "myfifo".
Did you mean:
mkfifo
2011 Dec 12
0
bash on Centos 5 can not source FIFOs ...
Hello
I run into this problem on CentOS 5.7 (Final), that if I try to source a
FIFO in bash, my command will be silently ignored and nothing from the
FIFO is interpreted. Here is a simple example:
[root at appserver2 ~]# mkfifo /tmp/myfifo
[root at appserver2 ~]# echo ls -l >/tmp/myfifo &
[2] 23771
[root at appserver2 ~]# source /tmp/myfifo # no `ls? output here...
[root at appserver2 ~]# rm /tmp/myfifo
rm: remove fifo `/tmp/myfifo'? y
[2]+ Exit 1 echo ls -l > /tmp/myfifo
[root at appserver2 ~]#...
2009 Jun 10
1
[Bug 396] sshd orphans processes when no pty allocated
...le like me not comfortable with patching their ssh server can
probably take advantage of this workaround I wrote. This is just a "EOF
to SIGHUP" converter implemented in 4 lines of shell script (it simply
inserts a "cat" between sshd and the no longer orphan process).
TUBE=/tmp/myfifo.$$; mkfifo "$TUBE"
<"$TUBE" yourApplicationIgnoringEOFMoreOftenThanNot & appPID=$!
# unlike the above, cat WILL notice the EOF and politely die
cat >"$TUBE"
kill -HUP -$appPID; rm "$TUBE"
Feedback is welcome; do not hesitate to email me.
--...
2006 Mar 21
1
weird bugs with mmap-ing via NFS
[Moved from -current to -stable]
???????? 21 ???????? 2006 16:23, Matthew Dillon ?? ????????:
> ? ? You might be doing just writes to the mmap()'d memory, but the system
> ? ? doesn't know that.
Actually, it does. The program tells it, that I don't care to read, what's
currently there, by specifying the PROT_READ flag only.
> ? ? The moment you touch any mmap()'d