search for: my_unusual_license

...ion would be, what are people looking for that the MIT or 2-clause BSD license don't provide? They're short, clear, widely accepted and very permissive. Another possibility might be to dual-license packages with both an OSI-approved license and whatever-else-you-like, e.g. 'MIT | <my_unusual_license>', but IIUC there's a bunch more complexity there than just using an OSI-approved license. Karl On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > > > On 18.01.2017 00:13, Karl Millar wrote: >> >> Please don't use &...

...re people looking for that the MIT or > 2-clause BSD license don't provide? They're short, clear, widely > accepted and very permissive. Another possibility might be to > dual-license packages with both an OSI-approved license and > whatever-else-you-like, e.g. 'MIT | <my_unusual_license>', but IIUC > there's a bunch more complexity there than just using an OSI-approved > license. > > Karl > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Uwe Ligges > <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > > > > > > On 18.01.2017 00:13, Karl Mi...

Please don't use 'Unlimited' or 'Unlimited + ...'. Google's lawyers don't recognize 'Unlimited' as being open-source, so our policy doesn't allow us to use such packages due to lack of an acceptable license. To our lawyers, 'Unlimited + file LICENSE' means something very different than it presumably means to Uwe. Thanks, Karl On Sat, Jan 14,