Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "my_s".
Did you mean:
mm_s
2015 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Semantics of an Inbounds GetElementPtr
...load.
But i can't see how you expect it to determine anything else.
Can you walk me through the below testcase and epxlain what you expect
to ahppen?
If so, i can probably make it happen for you :)
>
> target datalayout = "e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
>
> %struct.my_s = type { i32, i32, [0 x i8*] }
>
> ; Function Attrs: noreturn
> declare void @__assert_rtn()
>
> define void @func(i8* %mem) {
> %1 = icmp eq i8* %mem, null
> br i1 %1, label %check.zero, label %stash.zero
>
> stash.zero:
> %2 = bitcast i8* %mem to %struct.my_s*...
2015 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Semantics of an Inbounds GetElementPtr
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 9:57 PM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Nicholas White <n.j.white at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi - I've got a question about what optimizations the "inbounds"
>> keyword of "getelementptr" allows you to use. In the code below, %five
>> is loaded
2015 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Semantics of an Inbounds GetElementPtr
...; block (changing the branch that jumps to
> it to go to the "abort" label instead) like this:
>
> define void @func2(i8* %mem) {
> %1 = icmp eq i8* %mem, null
> br i1 %1, label %check.zero, label %stash.zero
>
> stash.zero:
> %2 = bitcast i8* %mem to %struct.my_s*
> %3 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %mem, i64 4
> %4 = bitcast i8* %3 to i32*
> store i32 0, i32* %4, align 4
> br label %check.zero
>
> check.zero:
> %.0.i = phi %struct.my_s* [ %2, %stash.zero ], [ null, %0 ]
> %5 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.my_s, %stru...
2007 Feb 27
14
Using a single class multiple times
Hi-
Recently starting using puppet while migrating an existing messy group
of systems to some nice new hardware. Things are going incredibly well,
and puppet''s functioning great. Have a bit of a headache. I''d like to
keep myself from duplicating lots of included classes. Lets say I have
this (snippet of a) class:
class dbserver {
file { "/etc/my_${db}.cnf":
2015 Aug 10
0
PATCH for Stephan: Re: pigeonhole/lda accessing -m folder
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, matthias lay wrote:
Hi Matthias,
there is another possibility:
require ["fileinto", "variables", "subaddress", "envelope"];
if envelope :detail :matches "to" "*"
{
set "myfolder" "${1}";
} else {
set "myfolder"
2015 Aug 10
2
pigeonhole/lda accessing -m folder
complete patch. some parts were missing before
diff --git a/src/lib-sieve/plugins/environment/ext-environment-common.c
b/src/lib-sieve/plugins/environment/ext-environment-common.c
--- a/src/lib-sieve/plugins/environment/ext-environment-common.c
+++ b/src/lib-sieve/plugins/environment/ext-environment-common.c
@@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ static const struct sieve_environment_item
*core_env_items[] = {
2015 Jan 05
1
Re: use of qemu-kvm --chardev pipe, id=X, path=... argument ?
Aha! Thank you. Yes that does prevent the default stdio console .
But no output appears on the input pipe, and outputting to input end has
no effect:
In one terminal, I do:
$ cat /tmp/el6x32.out
in the main terminal, I run:
$ /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -M rhel6.4.0 -cpu n270 -smp 1 -hda
/home/rpmbuild/OEL6/img/OEL6_32.img -kernel
/home/rpmbuild/OEL6/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.39-400.215.14.el6uek.i686 -initrd
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking