search for: my_foo

...bars has_many :bars, :through => :foo_bars class bar has_many :foo_bars has_many :foos, :through => :foo_bars class foo_bars belongs_to :foo belongs_to :bar If I have an instance of foo and an instance of bar, how do I add the association between the two of them? my_foo.bars << my_bar or (inversely), my_bar.foos << my_foo or do I somehow need to manipulate the join model explicitly? Thanks, Brad -- Bradley Mazurek

All, I have some data that I need to be able to see across the application. For J2EE people out there, I need something that I want to have available in the "application scope" of my app. What is the best way to handle this? I''m trying to access a class variable that I created in my controller from my view (to no avail). Create a class variable in my helper class and use

Hi, I'm a happy user of libclang.so I got in trouble trying to get info from templated function such as /* File: t.cc */ template <class T1,class T2> void my_foo(T1 a,T2 b) { } I only got CXCursor_FunctionDecl cursor instead of CXCursor_FunctionTemplate and I don't getting CXCursor_TemplateTypeParameter. And argument type is Unexposed. I using 3.1 version with few patches. Maybe there is patch to handle this, but sorry I didn't found it.

It appears that the runtime for an R script can more than double if a few references to a function foo() are replaced by more explict references of the form pkgname::foo(). The more explicit references are of course required when two loaded packages define the same function. I can understand why use of this mechanism is not free in an interpreted environment like R, but the cost seems rather

...). Let''s say Bar has_many Bazs (how the heck do you pluralize Baz?). It would be nice to be able to say that Foo has_many Bazs through => Bar, but this does not seem to work. Am I right, or should it be possible to do this? The best I have been able to do is this: bazs = [] my_foo.bars.each do |b| bazs += b.bazs end bazs.uniq! That''s not TOO messy, but not as clean as foo.bazs. If I am right about foo.bazs not being possible, is there a better/ cleaner workaround than the one I am using? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You rec...

Hello, I would like to add functionality to the String class....where do I do this? Do I create a new model (if so, what do I call it?) and put something like: class String def my_new_string_method blah blah end end Thanks for any pointers. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...n types for your macros, and > gcc/builtin-attrs.def lists the attributes, though I've only ever > used ATTR_NOTHROW_LIST. > > a) Use the macro you defined earlier to generate your builtins, in > our example case it is > > DEF_MY_BUILTIN (BUILT_IN_MY_FOO, "my_foo", \ > BT_FN_PTR_PTRPTR_PTR, ATTR_NOTHROW_LIST) > > This is straightforward, the first parameter is an ID for your > builtin within gcc -- it just needs to be unique. The second is > the "name" of your builtin, which will be pre...

As mentioned in an earlier mail, I am working on an LLVM backend for a custom processor based on MIPS. My problem is how to extend LLVM to support some esoteric/non-standard feature of the underlying hardware. I saw in the "Extending LLVM" document, that the easiest / most common way to do this was using an intrinsic function, and examples of the technique abound (all SSE for