search for: my_caller

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "my_caller".

2016 Nov 27
2
Non-global variable that follows channel?
...ation. I do think the docs at https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+14+Function_SHARED could do with more clarification. BTW, there were a couple of typos in your code, so for anyone who wants to copy/paste, here's Richard's code WITH the curly braces ( Set(SHARED(sharedVar,MY_CALLER) should be Set(SHARED(sharedVar,${MY_CALLER}) ) [svtest1] exten => s,1,Answer() same => n,Verbose(1,Answered channel:${CHANNEL}) same => n,Set(__MY_CALLER=${CHANNEL(name)}) same => n,Dial(Local/s at svtest2,,g) same => n,Verbose(1,***In channel:${CHANNEL} sharedVar:$...
2016 Nov 27
2
Non-global variable that follows channel?
Thanks, Max. Yes, of course, you are right, and I am an idiot because I was tired and putting underscores before the variable name when I read it back! Then I forgot to post the followup email to say I had figured it out. Now, this SHARED was not something I was aware of, but looked like an ideal solution to passing variables BACK from to the parent channel. However, it does not seem to be very
2017 Sep 19
1
Changes to 'ADJCALLSTACK*' and 'callseq_*' between LLVM v4.0 and v5.0
Hi Serge, Thanks for your help. I have looked at the change log, and so far as I can tell, my implementation is pretty much identical to all of the in-tree targets, but I’m missing something and can’t see what it is. I have simplified my TD description to just: def MyCallseqStart : SDNode<"ISD::CALLSEQ_START", SDCallSeqStart<[SDTCisVT<0, i32>,
2017 Sep 15
0
Changes to 'ADJCALLSTACK*' and 'callseq_*' between LLVM v4.0 and v5.0
Hi Martin, Pseudo CALLSEQ_START was changed in r302527, commit message contains details on the changes. However CALLSEQ_END was not modified. If your made changes to ADJCALLSTACKUP to add additional argument, that may result in error. Thanks, --Serge 2017-09-15 19:09 GMT+07:00 Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hi LLVM-Devs, > > I have managed
2017 Sep 15
2
Changes to 'ADJCALLSTACK*' and 'callseq_*' between LLVM v4.0 and v5.0
Hi LLVM-Devs, I have managed to complete updating our sources from LLVM v4.0 to v5.0, but I am getting selection errors for 'callseq_end'. I am aware that the 'ADJCALLSTACKUP' and 'ADJCALLSTACKDOWN' patterns have changed, and have added an additional argument to the TD descriptions for these. There are interactions with 'ISD::CALL' and 'ISD::RET_FLAG',