Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "mxxxx".
Did you mean:
xxxx
2003 Sep 29
5
Nortel M Series phones support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've searched the mailing list quite extensively, but didn't come up
with anything promising (some things wer helpful, though). Does anyone
know if Nortel M Series (specifically the 2008, 2616, 7208, and 7310)
phones can be made to work with the TDM400P card or if they are ADSI
compatible at all? I kind of doubt they will work if they are
2020 Aug 24
0
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
...providing a second mask parameter '*'
in this case.
Looks like the function do_list_helper() only looks
at the mask set via the 'mask' command if it's not
recursing.
Looks like this might be a bug that no one ever ran
into before. Normally, people expect the mask given
to the mXXXX functions to take priority. I'm guessing
almost no one uses the 'mask' command.
2004 Jul 07
1
Windows XP Home problems
...come up before,
but I didn't find anything similar. But, I apologize ahead of time if
this has been dealt with already.
I'm running Samba 2.2.7a on Fedora Core 1 and I'm attempting to network
with a Windows XP Home computer. The following is my smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = Mxxxx
netbios name = Kxxxx
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
wins support = yes
[test]
comment = for testing only
path = /usr/local/test
read only = no...
2020 Aug 24
2
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
Dear fellows.
Another piece of information. The issue reprduces on RHEL 7.7, Samba 4.9.1
[root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo)
[root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V
Version 4.9.1
[root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -W "${d}" -U "${u}" "${s}" "${p}"
Try "help" to get a list of
2020 Aug 24
2
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
...39;
> in this case.
>
> Looks like the function do_list_helper() only looks
> at the mask set via the 'mask' command if it's not
> recursing.
>
> Looks like this might be a bug that no one ever ran
> into before. Normally, people expect the mask given
> to the mXXXX functions to take priority. I'm guessing
> almost no one uses the 'mask' command.
>