search for: mvnk

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "mvnk".

Did you mean: mink
2018 Mar 04
2
lmrob gives NA coefficients
...,?x) where diag(?x)=1, off-diag(?x)= ?X= 0.15 for low interdependency and ?x= 0.70 for high interdependency. Where ?x is correlation between explanatory variables. We chose two sample size 25 for small sample and 100 for large sample. The specific error in equations ?i, i=1,2,?..,n, we generated by MVNk=3 (0, ??), ?? the variance covariance matrix of errors, diag(??)= 1, off-diag(??)= ??= 0.15. To investigate the robustness of the estimators against outliers, we chosen different percentages of outliers ( 20%, 45%). We choose shrink parameter in (12) by minimize the new robust Cross Validation (CVM...
2018 Mar 04
0
lmrob gives NA coefficients
...1, > off-diag(?x)= ?X= 0.15 for low interdependency and ?x= 0.70 for high > interdependency. Where ?x is correlation between explanatory variables. We > chose two sample size 25 for small sample and 100 for large sample. The > specific error in equations ?i, i=1,2,?..,n, we generated by MVNk=3 (0, > ??), ?? the variance covariance matrix of errors, diag(??)= 1, > off-diag(??)= ??= 0.15. To investigate the robustness of the estimators > against outliers, we chosen different percentages of outliers ( 20%, 45%). > We choose shrink parameter in (12) by minimize the new robust C...
2018 Mar 04
1
lmrob gives NA coefficients
...diag(?x)= ?X= 0.15 for low interdependency and ?x= 0.70 for high >> interdependency. Where ?x is correlation between explanatory variables. We >> chose two sample size 25 for small sample and 100 for large sample. The >> specific error in equations ?i, i=1,2,?..,n, we generated by MVNk=3 (0, >> ??), ?? the variance covariance matrix of errors, diag(??)= 1, >> off-diag(??)= ??= 0.15. To investigate the robustness of the estimators >> against outliers, we chosen different percentages of outliers ( 20%, 45%). >> We choose shrink parameter in (12) by minimize...
2018 Mar 04
0
lmrob gives NA coefficients
...w interdependency and ?x= 0.70 for high >>> interdependency. Where ?x is correlation between explanatory variables. >>> We >>> chose two sample size 25 for small sample and 100 for large sample. The >>> specific error in equations ?i, i=1,2,?..,n, we generated by MVNk=3 (0, >>> ??), ?? the variance covariance matrix of errors, diag(??)= 1, >>> off-diag(??)= ??= 0.15. To investigate the robustness of the estimators >>> against outliers, we chosen different percentages of outliers ( 20%, >>> 45%). >>> We choose shrink p...
2018 Mar 03
0
lmrob gives NA coefficients
> On Mar 3, 2018, at 3:04 PM, Christien Kerbert <christienkerbert at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear list members, > > I want to perform an MM-regression. This seems an easy task using the > function lmrob(), however, this function provides me with NA coefficients. > My data generating process is as follows: > > rho <- 0.15 # low interdependency > Sigma <-
2018 Mar 03
2
lmrob gives NA coefficients
Dear list members, I want to perform an MM-regression. This seems an easy task using the function lmrob(), however, this function provides me with NA coefficients. My data generating process is as follows: rho <- 0.15 # low interdependency Sigma <- matrix(rho, d, d); diag(Sigma) <- 1 x.clean <- mvrnorm(n, rep(0,d), Sigma) beta <- c(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0) error <- rnorm(n = n,