Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "muyser".
Did you mean:
muser
2004 Nov 21
4
[LLVMdev] Nested functions
Was there already some reflection about how to lower the concept of nested
functions (and the corresponding static links) into llvm?
Dirk Muysers.
2004 Nov 22
0
[LLVMdev] Nested functions
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Dirk Muysers wrote:
> Was there already some reflection about how to lower the concept of nested
> functions (and the corresponding static links) into llvm?
This was discussed back in August, which discusses it, provides a solution
and an example:
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-August/0...
2004 Nov 22
0
[LLVMdev] Nested functions
On Nov 21, 2004, at 4:11 AM, Dirk Muysers wrote:
> Was there already some reflection about how to lower the concept of
> nested
> functions (and the corresponding static links) into llvm?
>
> Dirk Muysers.
I have not seen a discussion of this and none of our current front-ends
need it. A straightforward way to add supp...
2004 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] Nested functions
On Nov 22, 2004, at 10:00 AM, Vikram S. Adve wrote:
> I have not seen a discussion of this and none of our current front-ends
> need it. A straightforward way to add support for this would be:
>
> (a) Lower nested procedures into ordinary top-level functions in LLVM,
> with name-mangling to enforce scopes for each name.
>
> (b) I assume you don't want to use a display (a