Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "mux_detect".
Did you mean:
mux_detected
2015 May 28
12
[PATCH v2 1/9] acpi: Rename v1 DSM to mux to avoid ambiguity
..._MUX_POWER_SPEED 0x01
+#define NOUVEAU_DSM_MUX_POWER_STAMINA 0x02
#define NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_CAPS 0x1A
#define NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_FLAGS 0x1B
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
#define OPTIMUS_HDA_CODEC_MASK (2 << 27) /* hda bios control */
static struct nouveau_dsm_priv {
- bool dsm_detected;
+ bool mux_detected;
bool optimus_detected;
acpi_handle dhandle;
acpi_handle rom_handle;
@@ -53,15 +53,15 @@ bool nouveau_is_optimus(void) {
return nouveau_dsm_priv.optimus_detected;
}
-bool nouveau_is_v1_dsm(void) {
- return nouveau_dsm_priv.dsm_detected;
+bool nouveau_has_mux(void) {
+ return nouveau_ds...
2015 May 25
15
[PATCH 1/8] acpi: Rename v1 DSM to mux to avoid ambiguity
..._MUX_POWER_SPEED 0x01
+#define NOUVEAU_DSM_MUX_POWER_STAMINA 0x02
#define NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_CAPS 0x1A
#define NOUVEAU_DSM_OPTIMUS_FLAGS 0x1B
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
#define OPTIMUS_HDA_CODEC_MASK (2 << 27) /* hda bios control */
static struct nouveau_dsm_priv {
- bool dsm_detected;
+ bool mux_detected;
bool optimus_detected;
acpi_handle dhandle;
acpi_handle rom_handle;
@@ -53,15 +53,15 @@ bool nouveau_is_optimus(void) {
return nouveau_dsm_priv.optimus_detected;
}
-bool nouveau_is_v1_dsm(void) {
- return nouveau_dsm_priv.dsm_detected;
+bool nouveau_has_mux(void) {
+ return nouveau_ds...