search for: mutlifs

...therwise. HPA, what do you think? >> > > Step 1 is to commit it on a branch. I've actually been thinking about multifs since at least May and perhaps March. I think its change-set is enough that it warrants a release unto itself. When we're ready for 6.04, release 6.04, merge mutlifs, release 6.10, and probably update gnu-efi and release 6.11. Both of these change enough that they may have large impacts and warrant separation. I think HPA does have the right idea. Make a multifs branch to give it more traction and exposure. -- -Gene

...;>> >> >> Step 1 is to commit it on a branch. > > I've actually been thinking about multifs since at least May and > perhaps March. I think its change-set is enough that it warrants a > release unto itself. When we're ready for 6.04, release 6.04, merge > mutlifs, release 6.10, and probably update gnu-efi and release 6.11. > Both of these change enough that they may have large impacts and > warrant separation. > > I think HPA does have the right idea. Make a multifs branch to give > it more traction and exposure. > Put it on a branch a...

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > The MultiFS syntax is basically "(hdX,Y)/path/to/file", where X is disk > > number and Y is partition number. > > > > Thank you. > > As a reminder, please note: > > _ There was a syntax discussion about "multifs", so additional syntax > forms