Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "mustech".
2004 Sep 10
2
2/0, 2/2 3/0, 3/2, 5.1, wxyz
Josh Coalson wrote:
> --- smoerk <smoerk@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>>i didn't find anything about tagging flac files as surround files. i
>>think there should some possibility to tell the player how to play a
>>multi-channel file (how to map the different channels to the speakers
>>or if there some decode is needed, like for ambisonic files).
>
>
> it
2004 Sep 10
0
2/0, 2/2 3/0, 3/2, 5.1, wxyz
...r with height, mixed 1st/2nd order data)
16 WXYZRSTUVKLMNOPQ (third order with height)
(There can be no third order without height, since the
coefficents of all of the third order equations have a height
component. Note that I am just blindly using the equations from
http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/mustech/3d_audio/secondor.html; one would
want to check this with someone really in the know before standardizing
on it.)
Or one might want to tweak it to have every channel always in the same
"slot," which is currently broken by the 2, 6 and 10 channel formats.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs@cy...
2000 Jul 11
0
True surround sound for Ogg -- a proposal (fwd)
...and I would be very happy for it to be incorporated in Ogg.
Dave Malham.
/**************************************************************************/
/* Dave Malham "http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/music/dgm.htm" */
/* Music Technology Group "http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/mustech/welcome.htm"*/
/* Department of Music "http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/music/welcome.htm" */
/* The University of York Phone 01904 432448 */
/* Heslington Fax 01904 432450 */
/* York YO1 5DD...
2004 Sep 10
1
2/0, 2/2 3/0, 3/2, 5.1, wxyz
...rder data)
> 16 WXYZRSTUVKLMNOPQ (third order with height)
>
> (There can be no third order without height, since the
> coefficents of all of the third order equations have a height
> component. Note that I am just blindly using the equations from
> http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/mustech/3d_audio/secondor.html; one would
> want to check this with someone really in the know before standardizing
> on it.)
only 5.1 encoded ambisonics is missing, i think it's called g-format.
but i can ask in the sursound mailing list, if this options are sufficient.
2007 Apr 14
13
Ambisonics in Ogg Vorbis
On 2/28/07, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/28/07, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote:
> > Well, there are todo pages at wiki.xiph.org, but I meant more in the
> > community folklore sense. My point is a roadmap doesn't help much unless
> > there are people committed to making things happen. That's been the
> > problem with a
2007 Apr 14
13
Ambisonics in Ogg Vorbis
On 2/28/07, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/28/07, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote:
> > Well, there are todo pages at wiki.xiph.org, but I meant more in the
> > community folklore sense. My point is a roadmap doesn't help much unless
> > there are people committed to making things happen. That's been the
> > problem with a