search for: murga

...unteers? > > @Barry, see http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-October/022734.html > Ady, Thanks very much for the information. My memory got jogged, and I recalled the Puppy developers trying 5.x and encountering problems, including the LSS16 one, and deciding to stay with 4.0x: http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=85619&start=30 The reason that I am keen to move up to 6.0x is I want to support UEFI for Quirky Linux (and to pass on the know how to the Puppy guys). So, I will very much appreciate if one of the syslinux developer guys can fix that LSS16 problem! Regards, Ba...

...file approach... got to the end of loading the RAM disk image and it said pae not available on cpu and quit Sent from my iPhone > On May 13, 2020, at 4:31 PM, Daryl Kuchay <daryl.kuchay at icloud.com> wrote: > > ?Thank you for your information. I did look at this last week on the murga forum and saw archive.org mirroring, clever! I just tried the last 4 releases of tinycore to find .... pae kernels. Cant use those. I just watched dcore xenial (16.04) load for 20 minutes and cause reboot once ram was filled up. > > Let me try this as I really want. to provide relevant info...

> Hi, > I have just joined the list. > > I am the original creator of Puppy Linux, now letting other guys take > the reins, and I am working on a fork of Puppy called Quirky Linux, > where I try various experimental ideas. > > Up until now, in Puppy and all offshoots, we have used syslinux 4.05 or older. > > Over the last few days I have been testing 6.03 (using

...l >> > >> >> Ady, >> Thanks very much for the information. >> >> My memory got jogged, and I recalled the Puppy developers trying 5.x >> and encountering problems, including the LSS16 one, and deciding to >> stay with 4.0x: >> >> http://murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=85619&start=30 >> > >Hmm... That topic cannot be a trustworthy indication of Syslinux >features / functionality / compatibility / behavior, as that forum >topic includes too many typos, mistakes, misuse and misunderstanding. > >Additionall...

Hi, I have just joined the list. I am the original creator of Puppy Linux, now letting other guys take the reins, and I am working on a fork of Puppy called Quirky Linux, where I try various experimental ideas. Up until now, in Puppy and all offshoots, we have used syslinux 4.05 or older. Over the last few days I have been testing 6.03 (using the binary DEBs from Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn),

I'm running a CentOS 6.5 chroot to build Pale Moon (a Firefox fork) for older machines running distros like Puppy linux. Before anyone asks... * Yes, even though the older machines are using "ancient" glibc, etc, they do have security patches back-ported, e.g. http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=90461 "Lucid Puppy Revitalized as 5.2.8.7 - December, 2016" * I realize that CentOS 6.5 is "not safe for surfing". It starts at the commandline, and the only network activity is pulling down source code with git, and scp to send the compil...

Hi all. I'm using a CentOS 6.8 VM to do volunteer builds for an open source project. I want to build Pale Moon with a gtk2 library older than 2.24, to allow people with older linuxes to run it. Short summary, if built against version gtk2-2.24 and/or higher, the binary will use a function that does not exist in gtk2-2.23 and lower. Net result is that the program dies with an

Here at the company we have 3 programs coded in VB6 and I'm trying to run them under Ubuntu using Wine 1.3. First I used dependency walker to look at dependenices and i found it depend on these: msvbvm60.dll kernel32.dll user32.dll gdi32.dll advapi32.dll ole32.dll oleaut32.dll Also applications are using these controls: MSFLXGRD.OCX, MSMASK32.OCX and VBUProgress.ocx I copied them and

Hi All, I used to run webdt.org and this was built to support a tablet computer that hit the market around the late 90?s. DT Research makes them and they get sold to mostly enterprise applications. That being said there are still a few hundred thousand of these in circulation. The hardware is a bit of a hack. Its usb1.1 with a 44 pin flash module on 44 pin pata half height headers. MFGR