Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "muniwind".
Did you mean:
funwind
2014 Feb 07
2
[LLVMdev] Unwind behaviour in Clang/LLVM
On 7 February 2014 00:19, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> This (-fexceptions and -g imply -funwind-tables) seems like it's probably
> the right thing for most targets. With SjLj exceptions, -fexceptions
> probably doesn't need -funwind-tables.
>
Thanks, I think that's the general consensus, yes.
Do we have such logic in Clang at the moment?
My
2014 Feb 07
2
[LLVMdev] Unwind behaviour in Clang/LLVM
...Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 7 February 2014 09:35, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> Do we have such logic in Clang at the moment?
>
> Let me answer my own question. Right now, both -funwind-tables and -fno-unwind-tables only enable the -muniwind-tables for -cc1, and either lack or presence of that flag in -cc1 has the same behaviour on C++ code: they both generate .eh_frame sections.
>
> The only behaviour I found is that -munwind-tables will add uwtable to functions, which had no effect on x86_64. Is that because x86_64 mandates un...