search for: mulvey

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "mulvey".

Did you mean: muley
2012 May 19
7
Via Nano X2 Support?
Hi! Recently got a Via VE-900 board from Fry''s. It has a via nano x2 chip on it, and suggests that it has Intel-compatible virtualization extensions. Has anyone worked with this board yet? I thought it would be nice to have a lower-powered, nearly silent Xen machine sitting on my desk. I tried booting into Xen, but it said it didn''t recognize the processor. I can post
2012 May 19
7
Via Nano X2 Support?
Hi! Recently got a Via VE-900 board from Fry''s. It has a via nano x2 chip on it, and suggests that it has Intel-compatible virtualization extensions. Has anyone worked with this board yet? I thought it would be nice to have a lower-powered, nearly silent Xen machine sitting on my desk. I tried booting into Xen, but it said it didn''t recognize the processor. I can post
2011 Jul 09
10
Starting basic HVM -- where am I going wrong?
I''ve been using Xen strictly for PV for a while now, but I recently upgraded to hardware capable of HVM domUs. I''m trying to get a really basic HVM instance going so I can get my hands around making them work, in anticipation of using one to run a BSD to act as a firewall for other domUs on the machine. (I like PF.) Also, I might need run windows at some point, I suppose.
2012 Apr 24
21
no console when using xl toolstack xen 4.1.2
Hello! I was asking for help on the Freenode channel, and I was pointed here. I have a situation where, using xl, I can create a functional PV domU, with or without pv-grub, but I cannot access the console. Firing up xend and using xm works without trouble. Since xend and company is being deprecated, I would like to transition to using the xl toolstack. The system is an Arch Linux system
2013 Dec 14
1
Possible pigeonhole dealing with negative numerical values
Using dovecot 2.2.9 and pigeonhole 0.4.2 The system is a Xen VM running Arch Linux x86_64, presently up to date, on an XFS filesystem in an LVM2 partition. After recently updating my mail server, I found that a sieve rule I had which would check X-Spam-Score for a value over a certain number, in my case 2.5. In my most recent update, negative values would trip the rule. Here's the rule in