search for: multistag

Seems there were a couple of correlated failures that appear to be flakes on this buildbot recently: green: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13974 red: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13975 (target-override.c during stage 1, seems to be missing the directory/symlink it just created) red: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13976 (same test failure as the...

...- > From: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org>, > Serge Pavlov <sepavloff at gmail.com>, powerllvm at ca.ibm.com > Cc: > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage > Date: Tue, Sep 1, 2020 6:10 PM > > Seems there were a couple of correlated failures that appear to be flakes > on this buildbot recently: > > green: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13974 > red: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builde...

Sure. I didn't use lit or ninja. I simply copied the script produced by lit (/home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64le-multistage/stage1/tools/clang/test/Driver/Output/target-override.c.script) into a temporary directory (along with a deep copy of the build directory). I modified the paths in the script to point to the temporary directory. Then I ran the script in a loop. For running a bunch in...

...er 3, 2020 4:16 PM > *To:* David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > *Cc:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; LLVM on Power < > powerllvm at ca.ibm.com>; Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanjai at ca.ibm.com> > *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage > > > > https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/lit.html > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/lit.html__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!pMM0AcKS3gRL1wx2OJk-DMZG6KNuO3f602ILYnDX01_Q_Se_K_tNOHEg9mWS8jKYBA$> > already lists %T as "parent directory of %t (not un...

...failing? Maybe they do it in some slightly different manner? > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 5:03 AM Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Sure. >> I didn't use lit or ninja. I simply copied the script produced by lit (/home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64le-multistage/stage1/tools/clang/test/Driver/Output/target-override.c.script) into a temporary directory (along with a deep copy of the build directory). I modified the paths in the script to point to the temporary directory. >> Then I ran the script in a loop. >> For r...

...p 3, 2020 at 5:03 AM Nemanja Ivanovic < >> nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Sure. >> >> >> I didn't use lit or ninja. I simply copied the script produced by >> lit >> (/home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64le-multistage/stage1/tools/clang/test/Driver/Output/target-override.c.script) >> into a temporary directory (along with a deep copy of the build directory). >> I modified the paths in the script to point to the temporary directory. >> >> >> Then I ran...

...ifferent manner? >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 5:03 AM Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Sure. >> >> I didn't use lit or ninja. I simply copied the script produced by lit (/home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64le-multistage/stage1/tools/clang/test/Driver/Output/target-override.c.script) into a temporary directory (along with a deep copy of the build directory). I modified the paths in the script to point to the temporary directory. >> >> Then I ran the script in a loop. >&...

..., Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> > *Cc:* David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>; LLVM on Power < > powerllvm at ca.ibm.com>; Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanjai at ca.ibm.com>; > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage > > > > I think that was maybe the discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D78245 > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/reviews.llvm.org/D78245__;!!JmoZiZGBv3RvKRSx!qUxaxgSDhAK0UvjN4Fw4SZNtpJl1UErEyIr-afENDwN-PUSngxiJsLPt6J7cBGD38A$> > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 6...

in a multi-stage form, what is the proper way for handling the passing of the object thru each step ? If i have a database called events, and my controller looks like step = @params[:step] || 1 if step == 1 @event = Event.new @event = @session[:event] if @session[:event] elsif step == 2 @event = Event.new @event = @params[:event] elsif step == 3 @event = Event.new @event =

This just failed again: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/1579 Bill, could you take a look at this? This is like the 3rd time I've been incorrectly pinged by this buildbot due to this issue. -- Sean Silva On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for taking a look. The flaky ASan test f...

...nly on stage 2, so an actual miscompile wouldn't surprise me either. On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Also, `Clang Tools :: include-fixer/merge.test` seems to be a bit flaky: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/1304 > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/1315 > > Ben, it looks like you're the one that added that test. Is there any chance > it could be a nondeterminism or something in the code? > > -- Sean Silva > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016...

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage/builds/60 probably didn't use OS X? On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:20 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Can we XFAIL it only on OSX/Darwin & file a bug? It sounds like the issue > may be restricted to that platform & there's incomplete (possibly ongoing) &...

Dear WizaRds, dear Thomas, First of all, I want to tell you how grateful I am for all your support. I wish I will be able to help others along one day the same way you do. Thank you so much. I am struggling with a multistage sampling design: library(survey) multi3 <- data.frame(cluster=c(1,1,1,1 ,2,2,2, 3,3), id=c(1,2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,2), nl=c(4,4,4,4, 3,3,3, 2,2), Nl=c(100,100,100,100, 50,50,50, 75,75), M=rep(23,9), y=c(23,33,77,25, 35,74,27, 37,72) ) dmulti3 <- svydesign(id=~cluster+id, fpc=~M+Nl, data=mult...

...miscompile wouldn't surprise me either. > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Also, `Clang Tools :: include-fixer/merge.test` seems to be a bit flaky: > > > > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/1304 > > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/1315 > > > > Ben, it looks like you're the one that added that test. Is there any > chance > > it could be a nondeterminism or something in the code? > > > > -- S...

...d the results pages are no longer available. BTW, I tried testing the same revision many times on the same machine and other BE and LE powerpc machines and never saw this. On 06/28/16 21:42, Sean Silva wrote: > This just failed again: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/1579 > > Bill, could you take a look at this? This is like the 3rd time I've been > incorrectly pinged by this buildbot due to this issue. > > -- Sean Silva > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com > <mailto:chisophugis at g...

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:24 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Nico Weber <thakis at google.com> wrote: >> >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage/builds/60 >> probably didn't use OS X? > > > Fair point - Kostya/Dmitry, any ideas here? > >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:20 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Can we XFAIL it only on OSX/Darwin & file a...

...e there's a lot of appetite for improving this. Hence me asking about removing llvmbb (...and so far everyone seems to be in favor). In this case, from my IRC scrollback (there's more people on the blamelist, spread over several follow-on IRC messages): build #13975 of clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage is complete: Failure [failed ninja check 1] Build details are at http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13975 blamelist: LLVM GN Syncbot <llvmgnsyncbot at gmail.com>, Nico Weber < thakis at chromium.org> build #24132 of clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu is...

Hi Bill, just a heads up but this bot seems to have spuriously failed on a build that only pulled in my commit r272505 which is unrelated. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt/builds/4883 -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160612/8b2c4493/attachment.html>

On 01/22/2016 09:47 PM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev wrote: > Here's another one: > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage/builds/60 I just got another error. Could we possibly disable this test until this issue has been resolved? Best, Tobias

...| 10:27:02 sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap | 09:01:37 clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu | 08:53:01 sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast | 08:49:58 clang-cmake-thumbv7-full-sh | 08:08:41 clang-s390x-linux-multistage | 07:30:04 clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon | 07:10:25 clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost | 07:09:42 clang-ppc64be-linux | 05:51:22 clang-cmake-armv8-selfhost-neon | 04:41:00 sanitizer-x86_64-linux...