Displaying 20 results from an estimated 421 matches for "multiports".
Did you mean:
multiport
2006 Mar 15
5
Possible bug with multiport?
Hi Folks: I am either using the multiport of the -m or --match option
of iptables in correctly or there is a bug with it. Is anyone else
using it with no problem? This is the way I am trying to use it:
my_ports=21,25,80
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $wan_addr -p tcp -m multiport
--dports $my_ports -j DNAT --to $my_internal_address
I have used this in the past successfully but that was a
2006 Feb 16
1
[Bug 451] New: ip6tables port range support in multiport modules is broken
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=451
Summary: ip6tables port range support in multiport modules is
broken
Product: iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ip6tables
2018 Mar 14
0
[Bug 1233] New: Problem with import of small iptables rule sets with multiport match
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1233
Bug ID: 1233
Summary: Problem with import of small iptables rule sets with
multiport match
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
2003 Mar 23
5
Shorewall 1.4.1a
Rather than have lots of folks downloading a version with a broken ''check''
command, I''ve released 1.4.1a that corrects the problem.
Sorry for the back-to-back releases today...
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.sf.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2010 Jan 21
2
Samba behind NAT
Hello All,
I have a strange problem regarding samba 3.0.37
I have samba server installed in the local network behind NAT, the
router iptables are configured as follows:
#samba
$IPT -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INET_IFACE -p udp -d $INET_IP -m multiport --dports 137,138 -j DNAT --to-destination $FILESERV
$IPT -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INET_IFACE -p tcp -d $INET_IP -m multiport
2004 Feb 03
2
Pictures of new multiport FXO/FXS from digum
Does the voicetronix card work with Asterisk?
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
woody+asterisk@solutionsfirst.com.au
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:06 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pictures of new multiport FXO/FXS from
digum
> -----Original Message-----
2010 Mar 30
0
[PATCH] virtio: console: Disable multiport support
The host and guest currently enumerate ports independently. This can
lead to problems after several hot-plug/unplug operations and
migrations. The fix is to let the management software instantiate ports
at fixed locations and the host lets the guest know which 'id' to add a
new port to.
Since this is an intrusive change, and we don't want to support the
current ABI, disable
2010 Mar 30
0
[PATCH] virtio: console: Disable multiport support
The host and guest currently enumerate ports independently. This can
lead to problems after several hot-plug/unplug operations and
migrations. The fix is to let the management software instantiate ports
at fixed locations and the host lets the guest know which 'id' to add a
new port to.
Since this is an intrusive change, and we don't want to support the
current ABI, disable
2006 Dec 11
6
load balacing with https home banking
Hello everybody.
I''m running linux 2.6.19 with nth match to
alternatively snat outgoing connections to
two different ip addresses for load balancing
between two adsl lines:
Here is:
$IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m
multiport --dports 80,443 -m statistic --mode nth --every 2 -j SNAT --to
adslA
$IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m
multiport
2010 Mar 23
0
[PATCH 09/11] virtio: console: Don't always create a port 0 if using multiport
If we're using multiport, there's no point in always creating a console
port. Create the console port only if the host doesn't support
multiport.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com>
---
drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
2010 Mar 23
0
[PATCH 09/11] virtio: console: Don't always create a port 0 if using multiport
If we're using multiport, there's no point in always creating a console
port. Create the console port only if the host doesn't support
multiport.
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com>
---
drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
2010 Mar 30
3
[PATCH 4/4] virtio: disable multiport console support.
Unfortunately there proved to be at least one bug which requires an
ABI change, so we're best off not introducing multiport support until
2.6.35.
While I generally left the multiport code paths intact, I really wanted
to remove the ABI defines from the header, which meant some quite deep cuts.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah at
2010 Mar 30
3
[PATCH 4/4] virtio: disable multiport console support.
Unfortunately there proved to be at least one bug which requires an
ABI change, so we're best off not introducing multiport support until
2.6.35.
While I generally left the multiport code paths intact, I really wanted
to remove the ABI defines from the header, which meant some quite deep cuts.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah at
2013 May 21
2
[Bug 821] New: Rosa
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=821
Summary: Rosa
Product: iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: iptables
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
ReportedBy: andoandre at gmail.com
2007 Oct 30
0
2 NICS - local services not shaping correctly
Hi
Having a problem trying to figure out how to shape local services
running on the debian box (asterisk, squid etc) as currently the voice
only seems to be getting shaped one way when making external calls. For
example I have the rules below (these are the matching rules only not
the actual policy rules):
#Create Chain for local traffic (outbound)
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A match-all -m
2002 Aug 14
0
iptables 1.2.7 and MULTIPORT=Yes
The 1.2.7 release of iptables has made an incompatible change in the
syntax used to specify multiport matches. As a consequence, users
upgrading to iptables 1.2.7 must set MULTIPORT=No in
/etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf.
I''ll have an updated firewall script available in the next day or two.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
AIM: tmeastep \
2015 Feb 28
2
[PATCH] virtio_console: avoid config access from irq
when multiport is off, virtio console invokes config access from irq
context, config access is blocking on s390.
Fix this up by scheduling work from config irq - similar to what we do
for multiport configs.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
Applies on top of "virtio_console: init work unconditionally"
that I sent previously.
drivers/char/virtio_console.c
2015 Feb 28
2
[PATCH] virtio_console: avoid config access from irq
when multiport is off, virtio console invokes config access from irq
context, config access is blocking on s390.
Fix this up by scheduling work from config irq - similar to what we do
for multiport configs.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
Applies on top of "virtio_console: init work unconditionally"
that I sent previously.
drivers/char/virtio_console.c
2019 Feb 07
3
Samba and ufw
Rowland,
OK. Should I delete these lines?
diff yours mine
63d62
yours# -A ufw-after-logging-output -m limit --limit 3/min --limit-burst 10
-j LOG --log-prefix "[UFW ALLOW] "
85,87d83
yours# -A ufw-before-logging-forward -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m limit
--limit 3/min --limit-burst 10 -j LOG --log-prefix "[UFW AUDIT] "
yours# -A ufw-before-logging-input -m conntrack
2007 Jun 09
20
Shorewall 4.0.0 Beta 4
I''ve uploaded Beta 4. It corrects a bad bug involving exclusion in the
hosts file. In addition, it contains the first release of a new
Bridge/firewall implementation that uses the reduced-function physdev
match found in kernel 3.6.20 and 3.6.21.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA \