search for: multiports

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 421 matches for "multiports".

Did you mean: multiport
2006 Mar 15
5
Possible bug with multiport?
Hi Folks: I am either using the multiport of the -m or --match option of iptables in correctly or there is a bug with it. Is anyone else using it with no problem? This is the way I am trying to use it: my_ports=21,25,80 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $wan_addr -p tcp -m multiport --dports $my_ports -j DNAT --to $my_internal_address I have used this in the past successfully but that was a
2006 Feb 16
1
[Bug 451] New: ip6tables port range support in multiport modules is broken
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=451 Summary: ip6tables port range support in multiport modules is broken Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip6tables
2018 Mar 14
0
[Bug 1233] New: Problem with import of small iptables rule sets with multiport match
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1233 Bug ID: 1233 Summary: Problem with import of small iptables rule sets with multiport match Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5
2003 Mar 23
5
Shorewall 1.4.1a
Rather than have lots of folks downloading a version with a broken ''check'' command, I''ve released 1.4.1a that corrects the problem. Sorry for the back-to-back releases today... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.sf.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2010 Jan 21
2
Samba behind NAT
Hello All, I have a strange problem regarding samba 3.0.37 I have samba server installed in the local network behind NAT, the router iptables are configured as follows: #samba $IPT -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INET_IFACE -p udp -d $INET_IP -m multiport --dports 137,138 -j DNAT --to-destination $FILESERV $IPT -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $INET_IFACE -p tcp -d $INET_IP -m multiport
2004 Feb 03
2
Pictures of new multiport FXO/FXS from digum
Does the voicetronix card work with Asterisk? -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of woody+asterisk@solutionsfirst.com.au Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:06 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pictures of new multiport FXO/FXS from digum > -----Original Message-----
2010 Mar 30
0
[PATCH] virtio: console: Disable multiport support
The host and guest currently enumerate ports independently. This can lead to problems after several hot-plug/unplug operations and migrations. The fix is to let the management software instantiate ports at fixed locations and the host lets the guest know which 'id' to add a new port to. Since this is an intrusive change, and we don't want to support the current ABI, disable
2010 Mar 30
0
[PATCH] virtio: console: Disable multiport support
The host and guest currently enumerate ports independently. This can lead to problems after several hot-plug/unplug operations and migrations. The fix is to let the management software instantiate ports at fixed locations and the host lets the guest know which 'id' to add a new port to. Since this is an intrusive change, and we don't want to support the current ABI, disable
2006 Dec 11
6
load balacing with https home banking
Hello everybody. I''m running linux 2.6.19 with nth match to alternatively snat outgoing connections to two different ip addresses for load balancing between two adsl lines: Here is: $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m multiport --dports 80,443 -m statistic --mode nth --every 2 -j SNAT --to adslA $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s my_ip --protocol tcp -m multiport
2010 Mar 23
0
[PATCH 09/11] virtio: console: Don't always create a port 0 if using multiport
If we're using multiport, there's no point in always creating a console port. Create the console port only if the host doesn't support multiport. Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> --- drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 32 +++++++++++++++----------------- 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
2010 Mar 23
0
[PATCH 09/11] virtio: console: Don't always create a port 0 if using multiport
If we're using multiport, there's no point in always creating a console port. Create the console port only if the host doesn't support multiport. Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> --- drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 32 +++++++++++++++----------------- 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
2010 Mar 30
3
[PATCH 4/4] virtio: disable multiport console support.
Unfortunately there proved to be at least one bug which requires an ABI change, so we're best off not introducing multiport support until 2.6.35. While I generally left the multiport code paths intact, I really wanted to remove the ABI defines from the header, which meant some quite deep cuts. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> To: Amit Shah <amit.shah at
2010 Mar 30
3
[PATCH 4/4] virtio: disable multiport console support.
Unfortunately there proved to be at least one bug which requires an ABI change, so we're best off not introducing multiport support until 2.6.35. While I generally left the multiport code paths intact, I really wanted to remove the ABI defines from the header, which meant some quite deep cuts. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> To: Amit Shah <amit.shah at
2013 May 21
2
[Bug 821] New: Rosa
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=821 Summary: Rosa Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: andoandre at gmail.com
2007 Oct 30
0
2 NICS - local services not shaping correctly
Hi Having a problem trying to figure out how to shape local services running on the debian box (asterisk, squid etc) as currently the voice only seems to be getting shaped one way when making external calls. For example I have the rules below (these are the matching rules only not the actual policy rules): #Create Chain for local traffic (outbound) /sbin/iptables -t mangle -A match-all -m
2002 Aug 14
0
iptables 1.2.7 and MULTIPORT=Yes
The 1.2.7 release of iptables has made an incompatible change in the syntax used to specify multiport matches. As a consequence, users upgrading to iptables 1.2.7 must set MULTIPORT=No in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. I''ll have an updated firewall script available in the next day or two. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \
2015 Feb 28
2
[PATCH] virtio_console: avoid config access from irq
when multiport is off, virtio console invokes config access from irq context, config access is blocking on s390. Fix this up by scheduling work from config irq - similar to what we do for multiport configs. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Applies on top of "virtio_console: init work unconditionally" that I sent previously. drivers/char/virtio_console.c
2015 Feb 28
2
[PATCH] virtio_console: avoid config access from irq
when multiport is off, virtio console invokes config access from irq context, config access is blocking on s390. Fix this up by scheduling work from config irq - similar to what we do for multiport configs. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Applies on top of "virtio_console: init work unconditionally" that I sent previously. drivers/char/virtio_console.c
2019 Feb 07
3
Samba and ufw
Rowland, OK. Should I delete these lines? diff yours mine 63d62 yours# -A ufw-after-logging-output -m limit --limit 3/min --limit-burst 10 -j LOG --log-prefix "[UFW ALLOW] " 85,87d83 yours# -A ufw-before-logging-forward -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m limit --limit 3/min --limit-burst 10 -j LOG --log-prefix "[UFW AUDIT] " yours# -A ufw-before-logging-input -m conntrack
2007 Jun 09
20
Shorewall 4.0.0 Beta 4
I''ve uploaded Beta 4. It corrects a bad bug involving exclusion in the hosts file. In addition, it contains the first release of a new Bridge/firewall implementation that uses the reduced-function physdev match found in kernel 3.6.20 and 3.6.21. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \