search for: multijittest

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "multijittest".

2011 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc4 / 2.9: failing MultiJitTest.JitPool on Windows 7
...(both 3.0rc4 and 2.9) on Windows 7 using MinGW. From there, I thought I would run the tests located under unittests (i.e. ADTTests, AnalysisTests, ExecutionEnginetests, JITTests, SupportTests, UtilsTests and VMCoreTests). All of them pass without any problem, except for JITTests which fails on the MultiJitTest.JitPool test: [==========] Running 25 tests from 6 test cases. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 3 tests from MultiJitTest [ RUN ] MultiJitTest.EagerMode [ OK ] MultiJitTest.EagerMode (10 ms) [ RUN ] MultiJitTest.LazyMode [ OK ] MultiJitTest.L...
2011 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc4 / 2.9: failing MultiJitTest.JitPool on Windows 7
...> Windows 7 using MinGW. From there, I thought I would run the tests located > under unittests (i.e. ADTTests, AnalysisTests, ExecutionEnginetests, > JITTests, SupportTests, UtilsTests and VMCoreTests). All of them pass > without any problem, except for JITTests which fails on the > MultiJitTest.JitPool test: > [ RUN      ] MultiJitTest.JitPool > > MultiJITTest.cpp:164: Failure > > Value of: (intptr_t)&getPointerToNamedFunction > >   Actual: 4478936 > > Expected: (intptr_t)getPointerToNamedFunction("getPointerToNamedFunction") > > Which is: 1...
2011 Jul 29
2
[LLVMdev] sys::getHostTriple failed to recognize ARM correctly
...m/lib/Target/ARM/ARMCodeEmitter.cpp:831! 0 libc.so.6 0x402e5000 Stack dump: 0. Running pass 'ARM Machine Code Emitter' on function '@recur1' ******************** Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90. FAIL: LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/MultiJitTest.EagerMode (5875 of 6030) ******************** TEST 'LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/MultiJitTest.EagerMode' FAILED ******************** Note: Google Test filter = MultiJitTest.EagerMode [==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case. [----------] Global test environmen...
2011 Nov 04
7
[LLVMdev] JIT should query host info at runtime - Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on llvm-gcc-build-x86_64-darwin10-x-mingw32-x-armeabi
...FarCallToKnownFunction LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/JITTest.FunctionPointersOutliveTheirCreator LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/LazyLoadedJITTest.EagerCompiledRecursionThroughGhost LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/MultiJitTest.EagerMode LLVM-Unit :: ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/MultiJitTest.LazyMode I think that for JIT, the compiler should figure out what the host is with a *runtime* check (i.e., the JIT should not use the info from the configure flag --host.) Thanks, Sebastian > > - Daniel &...
2011 Nov 04
0
[LLVMdev] JIT should query host info at runtime - Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on llvm-gcc-build-x86_64-darwin10-x-mingw32-x-armeabi
...   LLVM-Unit :: > ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/JITTest.FunctionPointersOutliveTheirCreator >    LLVM-Unit :: > ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/LazyLoadedJITTest.EagerCompiledRecursionThroughGhost >    LLVM-Unit :: > ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/MultiJitTest.EagerMode >    LLVM-Unit :: > ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/MultiJitTest.LazyMode > > I think that for JIT, the compiler should figure out what the host > is with a *runtime* check (i.e., the JIT should not use the info from > the configure flag --host.) Err, what?...
2011 Nov 04
1
[LLVMdev] JIT should query host info at runtime - Re: buildbot failure in LLVM on llvm-gcc-build-x86_64-darwin10-x-mingw32-x-armeabi
...;> ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/JITTest.FunctionPointersOutliveTheirCreator >>    LLVM-Unit :: >> ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/LazyLoadedJITTest.EagerCompiledRecursionThroughGhost >>    LLVM-Unit :: >> ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/MultiJitTest.EagerMode >>    LLVM-Unit :: >> ExecutionEngine/JIT/Debug+Asserts/JITTests/MultiJitTest.LazyMode >> >> I think that for JIT, the compiler should figure out what the host >> is with a *runtime* check (i.e., the JIT should not use the info from >> the configure fla...