search for: multigene

On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 02:54:18AM +0800, Yuanchu Xie wrote: > From: talumbau <talumbau at google.com> Please fix the name here. > > A single patch to be broken up into multiple patches. What does this mean? > - Add working set reporting structure. > - Add per-node and per-memcg interfaces for working set reporting. > - Implement working set backend for MGLRU. Please

...;t seem to invoke the par(mfrow=...) or layout(matrix(...)) functions at more than one level. I've got something like: plot.gene<-function(gene){ par(fig=c(0,1,0.3,1)) #expression: track 1 plot(...) par(fig=c(0,1,0,0.4),new=TRUE) #position: track 2 plot(...)} plot.multigene<-function(gene,...){ pdf(paste(gene,".pdf",sep="")) par(mfrow=c(2,2)) tapply(gene,gene, plot.gene) dev.off()} The par(mfrow=) in plot.multigene, even when 'new=TRUE', is disregarded and I just get one sub-plot per page. Suggestions? (Thanks!)

...vival data and a continuous covariate as input and computes a curve giving log hazard ratio (or rate of failure for a specific time) as a function of the continuous covariate, as well as curves giving +-SE for that curve. A plot of this nature can also be found as figure 4 in Paik, et al., "A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast Cancer," 2004, New England Journal of Medicine, pp 2817-26. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. -Ben Ben Wittner Research fellow, MGH & Harvard Medical School wittner.ben at mgh.harvard.edu

After many helpful suggestions from many including Brian Ripley, Peter Dalgaard, Martin Maechler, Douglas Bates, and Tristan Savatier--it is clearly time to upgrade my system from SPARC-10 Solaris 2.4. Rational choice of configuration should be based on intended application and perhaps the fact it is my pension, not my university, which now finances my research. My most demanding applications