search for: mta

...llog are perfectly reasonable. As far as I can tell this 14-minute burst of sendmail activity exists in isolation. Can anyone suggest a reason for these log entries? Thanks. ------------------------------------------------- May 25 07:09:24 server sendmail[2942]: rejecting connections on daemon MTA: load average: 24 May 25 07:09:39 server sendmail[2942]: rejecting connections on daemon MTA: load average: 25 May 25 07:09:54 server sendmail[2942]: rejecting connections on daemon MTA: load average: 26 May 25 07:10:09 server sendmail[2942]: rejecting connections on daemon MTA: load average: 29 Ma...

...mba In chel di` si favelave... > You can put your service accounts in an OU and add a GPO that deny > logon/services/tasks locally. Shortly come back. I've created a 'Restricted' OU, a 'Restricted' group (i'm short in fantasy, today ;) and i've created an 'mta' user, both user and group in 'Restricted' OU, of course. And i've added 'mta' to 'Restricted' group. Clearly, in an DC, a xID get assigned to group: root at vdcsv1:~# getent group Restricted LNFFVG\restricted:x:3000026: but by the same way 'mta' user ge...

Hi all, I've never really wanted to create my own MTA, because I like Postfix quite a lot. And I always thought it would require a horribly lot of time to be able to create something that was anywhere even close to having Postfix's features. (I would shudder to even think about recreating Dovecot from scratch nowadays.) But slowly over time I'...

...0.16-14.RHEL on a newly installed CentOS 3.3 boxen and I get the following error: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:postfix ########################################### [100%] link /usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.8.gz incorrect for slave mta-sendmailman (/usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz mta-sendmailman) error: %trigger(postfix-2.0.20-1.centos3.1) scriptlet failed, exit status 2 link /usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.8.gz incorrect for slave mta-sendmailman (/usr/share/man/man1/sendmail.1.gz mta-sendmailman) link /usr/share/man/man8/sendmai...

...William Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 96 E. wedwards at cyberfusion.nl ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Roos (M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu) Date: 12/11/19 18:59 To: dovecot (dovecot at dovecot.org), wedwards (wedwards at cyberfusion.nl) Subject: RE: Lightweight LMTP daemon to avoid overkill MTA Yes dovecot, /etc/dovecot/conf.d/20-lmtp.conf ;) service lmtp { chroot = client_limit = 1 drop_priv_before_exec = no executable = lmtp extra_groups = $default_internal_group group = idle_kill = 0 inet_listener lmtp { address = haproxy = no port = 24 reuse_port = no ssl = no...

...am Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 96 E. wedwards at cyberfusion.nl ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Marc Roos (M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu) Date: 12/11/19 19:14 To: dovecot (dovecot at dovecot.org), wedwards (wedwards at cyberfusion.nl) Subject: RE: Re[2]: Lightweight LMTP daemon to avoid overkill MTA Yes I am running sendmail next to dovecot on backend servers. That works ok. I have some problems with re-routing mail in a proxy setup. -----Original Message----- To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re[2]: Lightweight LMTP daemon to avoid overkill MTA Hi, I was unclear in my question. The spam...

...hinking of using Dovecot submission to relay to the external relaying cluster. So, both relaying and routing are done externally - the Dovecot machine should only store mail. Of course, there should also be a mechanism that takes care of local delivery to Dovecot, like LMTP. Usually, I would use an MTA like Exim to take care of local delivery. I feel like a fully-featured MTA is overkill, though, as all other roles such an MTA would fulfill - relaying and spam filtering - are fulfilled on external servers. Q: Does anyone know of a lightweight LMTP daemon that can take care of local delivery to D...

...gt; > You can put your service accounts in an OU and add a GPO that deny > > logon/services/tasks locally. > > Shortly come back. > > I've created a 'Restricted' OU, a 'Restricted' group (i'm short in > fantasy, today ;) and i've created an 'mta' user, both user and group > in 'Restricted' OU, of course. > And i've added 'mta' to 'Restricted' group. > > Clearly, in an DC, a xID get assigned to group: > > root at vdcsv1:~# getent group Restricted > LNFFVG\restricted:x:3000026: > &...

...to send them emails and here is what shows up in the maillogs: Email to testuser3 - Mar 29 22:34:52 myserver sendmail[4379]: l2TMYqwj004379: from=root, size=54, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200703292234.l2TMYqwj004379 at myserver.vwh.net>, relay=r oot at localhost Mar 29 22:34:52 myserver sm-mta[4380]: l2TMYqMi004380: from=<root at myserver.vwh.net>, size=342, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200703292234.l2TMYqwj004379 at myserver .vwh.net>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA-v4, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Mar 29 22:34:52 myserver sendmail[4379]: l2TMYqwj004379: to=testuser3 at myserver.vwh...

Hi, i'm new on sieve, but want to use ist with sogo. The Problem is, that when i set a redirect or vacation rule like: redirect "email at example.com"; (real Adress is different) the sieve says the mail would be forwarded, but no mail is sent. (No Action in /var/log/maillog) And because there is no Error-Message it's difficult to search for... Dovecot log ------- Jan 28

Hi Current my set up is that the MTA and Dovecot (maildir) is on the same machine. Ive been asked to seperate the services from the same machine (too would like to add a secondary MTA - but thats future ideas). I read the documentation on NFS, but from other sites i have read. Most say this is NOT the best solution. My question is,...

Yes, I've been reading /. :) But this isn't the first time this has occured to me. With all the security vulnerbilties, would it be unreasonable to either change the default MTA from sendmail to Exim/Qmail/Postfix, or give people the option of installing something instead of Sendmail at install time? -- Avleen Vig "Say no to cheese-eating surrender-monkeys" Systems Admin "Fast, Good, Cheap. Pick any two." www.silverwra...

Maybe nice to share some details? -----Original Message----- To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re[4]: Lightweight LMTP daemon to avoid overkill MTA I ended up 'hacking' LMTP support into the external spam filter. Someone else already contributed 'real' patches to implement LMTP support, so once I go live with this mail platform it should be stable. Met vriendelijke groeten, William Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 96 E. wedwards...

...etting Access denied errors when I try to execute a .bat file that resides on a TRU64 samba share, from a Win95 command prompt. The drive is mapped as x:\ & for the sake of testing, the directory has been recursively set to 777 (chmod). Command prompt output: x:\> x:\r235\src\ntprpst\sharc\mta\src\build_sharc_fta.bat Access denied - x:\r235\src\ntprpst\sharc\mta\src\build~XM.bat X:\> X:\> x:\r235\src\ntprpst\sharc\mta\src\no_such_file.bat No file of directory - x:\r235\src\ntprpst\sharc\mta\src\no_such_file.bat X:\> Normally, I would assume this is some 8.3 filename quirk, but...

On Jan 13, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > and what would that change? > nothing if you think about how mail works! > > * the MTA receives the message > * the MTA confirms with 2xx status code > * later the delivery server rejects > * the MTA *must* create a bounce > > just don't reject mails after you confirmed you have received them in the SMTP session and if you don't want a mail after that DISCARD...

Yes I am running sendmail next to dovecot on backend servers. That works ok. I have some problems with re-routing mail in a proxy setup. -----Original Message----- To: Marc Roos; dovecot Subject: Re[2]: Lightweight LMTP daemon to avoid overkill MTA Hi, I was unclear in my question. The spam filter is only able to deliver mail over SMTP, not over LMTP.. So I would still need some kind of daemon that listens for SMTP and then offers incoming email to Dovecot's LMTP socket. Met vriendelijke groeten, William Edwards T. 040 - 711 44 9...

...Mwx3w@public.gmane.org Received: by 10.38.12.43 with SMTP id 43cs8575rnl; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:51:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.82.76 with SMTP id f76mr547559rnb; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:51:57 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <do-not-reply-5tc4TXWwyLM@public.gmane.org> Received: from omta16.mta.everyone.net (sitemail2.everyone.net [216.200.145.36]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 71si394734rna.2005.03.08.22.51.56; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:51:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: fail (gmail.com: domain of do-not-reply-5tc4TXWwyLM@public.gmane.org does not designate 216.200.145.3...

Hi, As some of you know, I started implementing the SMTP submission proxy a few years ago. It acts as a front-end for any MTA, adding the necessary functionality for an SMTP submission service, also known as a Mail Submission Agent (MSA) (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6409). The main reason I created this, back then, was implementing the BURL capability (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4468). The main application of that...

Currently pigeonhole supports reject which would generate a NDR for each message. (If I understand the current documentation) Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back to the primary MTA to reject the delivery rather than generating more back scatter NDRs. Anyone know if this is possible now (to forgo the NDR)'s or do we need to wait for ereject ? If so, how much work is involved? -- Robert inoc.net!rblayzor http://inoc.net/

Hi, When no MTA is installed, How to send an email with a cronjob? I have below entrty in my cronjob? my /etc/cron.d/backup file looks like this. MAILTO=myemail at example.com 15 11 * * * root /root/scripts/backup.sh Can I send this email via SMTP server? Hope to hear from you. -- Thank you Indunil Ja...