search for: mstm_cap

...l_dp.c index 79c27f91f42c0..1e29d3a012856 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c @@ -4699,20 +4699,6 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) return true; } -static bool -intel_dp_sink_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) -{ - u8 mstm_cap; - - if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x12) - return false; - - if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1) - return false; - - return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP; -} - static bool intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { @@ -4720,7 +4706,7 @@ intel...

...l_dp.c index 79c27f91f42c0..1e29d3a012856 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c @@ -4699,20 +4699,6 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) return true; } -static bool -intel_dp_sink_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) -{ - u8 mstm_cap; - - if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x12) - return false; - - if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1) - return false; - - return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP; -} - static bool intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { @@ -4720,7 +4706,7 @@ intel...

...r or not a sink supports MST + * @aux: The DP AUX channel to use + * @dpcd: A cached copy of the DPCD capabilities for this sink + * + * Returns: %True if the sink supports MST, %false otherwise + */ +bool drm_dp_read_mst_cap(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, + const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]) +{ + u8 mstm_cap; + + if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12) + return false; + + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1) + return false; + + return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_read_mst_cap); + /** * drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst() - Set the MST state for a top...

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM